Fig. 3.
A-C: Intrapelvic pressure comparison between VA-URS and T-URS groups at irrigation pressures of 50 cmH2O (A), 100 cmH2O (B), and 150 cmH2O (C) with varying flow rates. D-F: Effective flow rate comparison between VA-URS and T-URS groups at irrigation pressures of 50 cmH2O (D), 100 cmH2O (E), and 150 cmH2O (F) with varying flow rates. ** indicates P < 0.001; * indicates P < 0.05.

Comparison of intrapelvic pressure and effective flow rate between VA-URS and T-URS groups under different irrigation conditions. a–c Intrapelvic pressure comparison between VA-URS and T-URS groups at irrigation pressures of 50 cmH2O (a), 100 cmH2O (b), and 150 cmH2O (c) with varying flow rates. d–f Effective flow rate comparison between VA-URS and T-URS groups at irrigation pressures of 50 cmH2O (d), 100 cmH2O (e), and 150 cmH2O (f) with varying flow rates. **indicates p < 0.001; *indicates p < 0.05.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal