Skip Nav Destination
Close Modal
Update search
Filter
All
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
All
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
All
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
All
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
All
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
Filter
All
- All
- Title
- Author
- Author Affiliations
- Full Text
- Abstract
- Keyword
- DOI
- ISBN
- EISBN
- ISSN
- EISSN
- Issue
- Volume
- References
NARROW
Format
Subjects
Journal
Article Type
Date
Availability
1-1 of 1
Keywords: Pyeloplasty, open
Close
Follow your search
Access your saved searches in your account
Would you like to receive an alert when new items match your search?
Sort by
Journal Articles
Is Antegrade Endopyelotomy Really Less Invasive than Open Pyeloplasty?
Available to PurchaseSubject Area:
Further Areas
Journal:
Urologia Internationalis
Urol Int (2007) 79 (2): 152–156.
Published Online: 13 September 2007
... postoperatively, was 96% (median follow-up 37 (24–196) months) and 76% (median follow-up 32 (24–73) months), respectively. Conclusion: Open pyeloplasty and endopyelotomy both have a high success rate with better patency results after open pyeloplasty. Open pyeloplasty is more invasive and has a higher morbidity...
