Article navigation

Introduction: Digital transformation of European healthcare is progressing rapidly, yet implementation in outpatient specialist care remains uneven. In Germany, office-based urologists face distinct structural, regulatory, and economic challenges. We assessed digital infrastructure, tool utilization, perceived barriers, and investment behavior, including age-related differences. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey (April–July 2024) among private practice urologists in Germany using a 35-item questionnaire structured along three dimensions of digital adoption (infrastructure, functional use, physician attitudes). Items were adapted from two previously published, peer-reviewed German urology surveys, and pretested with 12 urologists prior to launch. A total of 189 valid responses (response rate: 17.4%) were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and prespecified multivariable logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, practice size, years in practice, and region. Results: Self-reported digital familiarity was high (66.1% familiar or very familiar), yet infrastructure remained traditional: 92.6% used on-site servers and only 7.4% any cloud component. Telemedicine was rarely used (61.9% never), while 49.2% used health apps or DiGAs. Adjusted analyses confirmed that age <55 years (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.56–5.52, p < 0.001) and shorter time in practice (aOR: 0.78 per +5 years, 95% CI: 0.65–0.94, p = 0.009) independently predicted DiGA use and revealed that telemedicine adoption was driven primarily by practice size (aOR: 1.16 per additional full-time equivalent, 95% CI: 1.05–1.29, p = 0.005) rather than age. Most practices planned to invest less than EUR 30,000 over 5 years. Conclusions: Digitalization in outpatient urology remains primarily administrative. High familiarity does not translate into clinical transformation, and adoption is constrained by structural rather than generational barriers. Targeted funding, interoperable systems, and clear reimbursement frameworks are needed to enable clinically meaningful digital integration.

1.
Stachwitz
P
,
Debatin
JF
.
[Digitalization in healthcare: today and in the future]
.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz
.
2023
;
66
(
2
):
105
13
.
2.
Bronneke
JB
,
Hagen
J
,
Kircher
P
,
Matthies
H
.
[Digitized healthcare in 2030-a possible scenario]
.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz
.
2021
;
64
(
10
):
1285
91
.
3.
Bronneke
JB
,
Debatin
JF
.
[Digitalization of healthcare and its effects on quality of care]
.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz
.
2022
;
65
(
3
):
342
7
.
4.
Haas
H
,
Müller
L
,
Speck
T
,
Michel
MS
,
Huber
J
.
[Structure of outpatient urology care in Germany]
.
Urologie
.
2023
;
62
(
5
):
503
9
.
5.
Gehrmann
J
,
Hahn
F
,
Stephan
J
,
Steger
A
,
Rattka
M
,
Rudolph
I
, et al
.
Current use, challenges, barriers, and chances of telemedicine in the ambulatory sector in Germany-A survey study among practicing cardiologists, internists, and general practitioners
.
Telemed J E Health
.
2025
;
31
(
6
):
779
92
.
6.
Pohlmann
S
,
Kunz
A
,
Ose
D
,
Winkler
EC
,
Brandner
A
,
Poss-Doering
R
, et al
.
Digitalizing health services by implementing a personal electronic health record in Germany: qualitative analysis of fundamental prerequisites from the perspective of selected experts
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2020
;
22
(
1
):
e15102
.
7.
Trenfield
SJ
,
Awad
A
,
McCoubrey
LE
,
Elbadawi
M
,
Goyanes
A
,
Gaisford
S
, et al
.
Advancing pharmacy and healthcare with virtual digital technologies
.
Adv Drug Deliv Rev
.
2022
;
182
:
114098
.
8.
Dahlhausen
F
,
Zinner
M
,
Bieske
L
,
Ehlers
JP
,
Boehme
P
,
Fehring
L
.
Physicians’ attitudes toward prescribable mHealth apps and implications for adoption in Germany: mixed methods study
.
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth
.
2021
;
9
(
11
):
e33012
.
9.
Holetzek
T
,
Häusler
A
,
Gödde
K
,
Rapp
M
,
Spallek
J
,
Holmberg
C
.
The role of the installed base in information exchange among general practitioners in Germany: mixed methods study
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2025
;
27
:
e65241
.
10.
Giebel
GD
,
Speckemeier
C
,
Abels
C
,
Plescher
F
,
Börchers
K
,
Wasem
J
, et al
.
Problems and barriers related to the use of digital health applications: scoping review
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2023
;
25
:
e43808
.
11.
Petzold
T
,
Steidle
O
.
[Digital transformation of German healthcare organizations: current status and existing challenges from the perspective of quality management]
.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz
.
2023
;
66
(
9
):
972
81
.
12.
Topfer
A
,
Brabander
G
.
Personalisation of treatment pathways: analysis of chances and barriers by the implementation of digital technologies under the conditions of the German health system
.
F1000Res
.
2021
;
10
:
147
.
13.
Fava
VMD
,
Lapao
LV
.
Provision of digital primary health care services: overview of reviews
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2024
;
26
:
e53594
.
14.
Graf
A
,
Fehring
L
,
Henningsen
M
,
Zinner
M
.
Going digital in Germany: an exploration of physicians’ attitudes towards the introduction of electronic prescriptions – a mixed methods approach
.
Int J Med Inform
.
2023
;
174
:
105063
.
15.
Alotaibi
N
,
Wilson
CB
,
Traynor
M
.
Enhancing digital readiness and capability in healthcare: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators
.
BMC Health Serv Res
.
2025
;
25
(
1
):
500
.
16.
Borges do Nascimento
IJ
,
Abdulazeem
H
,
Vasanthan
LT
,
Martinez
EZ
,
Zucoloto
ML
,
Østengaard
L
, et al
.
Barriers and facilitators to utilizing digital health technologies by healthcare professionals
.
NPJ Digit Med
.
2023
;
6
(
1
):
161
.
17.
Oudbier
SJ
,
Souget-Ruff
SP
,
Chen
BSJ
,
Ziesemer
KA
,
Meij
HJ
,
Smets
EMA
.
Implementation barriers and facilitators of remote monitoring, remote consultation and digital care platforms through the eyes of healthcare professionals: a review of reviews
.
BMJ Open
.
2024
;
14
(
6
):
e075833
.
18.
Sorg
H
,
Ehlers
JP
,
Sorg
CGG
.
Digitalization in medicine: are German medical students well prepared for the future
.
Int J Environ Res Public Health
.
2022
;
19
(
14
):
8308
.
19.
Schlieter
H
,
Kählig
M
,
Hickmann
E
,
Fürstenau
D
,
Sunyaev
A
,
Richter
P
, et al
.
[Digital health applications (DiGA) in the area of tension between progress and criticism: Discussion paper from the “Digital health” specialist group of the German Informatics Society]
.
Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz
.
2024
;
67
(
1
):
107
14
.
20.
Rodler
S
,
Schütz
JM
,
Styn
A
,
Weinhold
P
,
Casucelli
J
,
Eismann
L
, et al
.
Mapping telemedicine in German private practice urological care: implications for transitioning beyond the COVID-19 pandemic
.
Urol Int
.
2021
;
105
(
7–8
):
650
6
.
21.
Borkowetz
A
,
Leitsmann
M
,
Baunacke
M
,
Borgmann
H
,
Boehm
K
,
Groeben
C
, et al
.
Akzeptanz und Stand der Digitalisierung in Klinik und Praxis
.
Die Urologie
.
2022
;
61
(
12
):
1365
72
.
22.
von Elm
E
,
Altman
DG
,
Egger
M
,
Pocock
SJ
,
Gøtzsche
PC
,
Vandenbroucke
JP
, et al
.
The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies
.
Ann Intern Med
.
2007
;
147
(
8
):
573
7
.
23.
Nohl-Deryk
P
,
Brinkmann
JK
,
Gerlach
FM
,
Schreyögg
J
,
Achelrod
D
, et al
.
Hürden bei der Digitalisierung der Medizin in Deutschland – eine Expertenbefragung
.
Gesundheitswesen
.
2018
;(
11
):
939
45
.
24.
Hansen
A
,
Herrmann
M
,
Ehlers
JP
,
Mondritzki
T
,
Hensel
KO
,
Truebel
H
, et al
.
Perception of the progressing digitization and transformation of the German health care system among experts and the public: mixed methods study
.
JMIR Public Health Surveill
.
2019
;
5
(
4
):
e14689
.
25.
National Academy of Medicine
;
The Learning Health System Series
,
Wang
ZA
,
Sriram
RD
, editors.
Procuring interoperability: achieving High-Quality, connected, and person-centered care
.
Washington (DC)
:
National Academies Press (US)
;
2018
. I, why interoperability is essential in health care.
26.
Institut I
.
Praxisbarometer Digitalisierung 2025: Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung der niedergelassenen Ärzte und Psychotherapeuten [Practice Barometer Digitalization 2024: results of a representative survey of office-based physicians and psychotherapists]
;
2025
. Available from: https://www.kbv.de/infothek/zahlen-und-fakten/studien-und-berichte/praxisbarometer-digitalisierung
27.
Novara
G
,
Checcucci
E
,
Crestani
A
,
Abrate
A
,
Esperto
F
,
Pavan
N
, et al
.
Telehealth in urology: a systematic review of the literature. How much can telemedicine be useful during and after the COVID-19 pandemic
.
Eur Urol
.
2020
;
78
(
6
):
786
811
.
28.
Badalato
GM
,
Kaag
M
,
Lee
R
,
Vora
A
,
Burnett
A
.
Role of telemedicine in urology: contemporary practice patterns and future directions
.
Urol Pract
.
2020
;
7
(
2
):
122
6
.
29.
Dubin
JM
,
Wyant
WA
,
Balaji
NC
,
Ong
WL
,
Kettache
RH
,
Haffaf
M
, et al
.
Telemedicine usage among urologists during the COVID-19 pandemic: cross-sectional study
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2020
;
22
(
11
):
e21875
.
30.
Schönburg
S
,
Gratzke
C
,
Miller
K
,
Wiemer
L
, et al
.
Digitale Gesundheitsanwendungen in der Urologie
.
Die Urologie
.
2024
;
63
(
9
):
850
9
.
31.
Cirkel
L
,
Lechner
F
,
Schlicker
N
,
Leipe
J
,
Mühlensiepen
F
,
Grgic
I
, et al
.
Adoption and perception of prescribable digital health applications (DiGA) and the advancing digitalization among German internal medicine physicians: a cross-sectional survey study
.
BMC Health Serv Res
.
2024
;
24
(
1
):
1353
.
32.
Bundesgesundheitsministerium, Gesetz für ein Zukunftsprogramm Krankenhäuser (Krankenhauszukunftsgesetz– KHZG)
.
Bundesgesetzblatt Jahrgang 2020 Teil I Nr. 48, ausgegeben zu Bonn
.
2020
;
23
.
33.
Dick
H
,
Doth
S
,
Ernst
C
,
Fischer
S
,
Holderried
M
.
Aktuelle Entwicklungen zur Digitalisierung: Eine Analyse zu Qualität und Ökonomie in der Gesundheitsversorgung [Current developments on digitalization: analysis of quality and economics in healthcare]
.
Urologe A
.
2021
;
60
(
9
):
1141
9
.
34.
Huber
J
,
Borgmann
H
,
Miller
K
,
Merseburger
AS
,
Krege
S
,
Gratzke
C
.
[Urology 2030: why it is key to promote digitisation in urology today to maintain medical care in the future – an expert consensus]
.
Aktuelle Urol
.
2023
;
54
(
3
):
213
9
.
35.
Hyde
R
.
An end to Germany’s bureaucratic nightmare
.
Lancet
.
2006
;
367
(
9524
):
1717
8
.
36.
Koehle
H
,
Kronk
C
,
Lee
YJ
.
Digital health equity: addressing power, usability, and trust to strengthen health systems
.
Yearb Med Inform
.
2022
;
31
(
1
):
20
32
.
37.
Bracken
A
,
Reilly
C
,
Feeley
A
,
Sheehan
E
,
Merghani
K
,
Feeley
I
.
Artificial intelligence (AI): powered documentation systems in healthcare: a systematic review
.
J Med Syst
.
2025
;
49
(
1
):
28
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Digital Version

Pay-Per-View Access
$45.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal