Article navigation

Introduction: In penile cancer, guideline-concordant invasive nodal staging in clinically node-negative (cN0) patients must balance diagnostic value against perioperative harm. We quantified early perioperative outcomes within a guideline-concordant nodal staging pathway, comparing primary dynamic sentinel node biopsy/sentinel lymph-node excision (DSNB/SLNE) with completion inguinal lymph-node dissection (ILND) performed after sentinel node positivity in a stage-restricted pT1b+ cohort. Methods: Single-center retrospective observational cohort study at a tertiary referral center, January 2013–December 2024. Of 127 screened patients undergoing any groin procedure, 98 had complete datasets; the primary analysis was restricted to pT1b+ disease (n = 61). Primary outcomes were 30-day major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥III) and length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were type-specific complications, unplanned readmission, and reoperation. Outcomes were captured per procedure using distinct 30-day windows. Paired within-patient analyses used exact McNemar and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests; unpaired sensitivity analyses used Fisher’s exact and Welch’s t tests. Results: In the pT1b+ cohort, 61 patients underwent primary SLNE/DSNB, and 30 subsequently underwent completion ILND after sentinel node positivity. For perioperative analyses, procedures were evaluated at the procedure level (61 SLNE procedures; 30 completion ILND procedures). Major complications occurred in 4/61 (6.7%) after SLNE versus 8/30 (26.7%) after completion ILND (absolute difference 20.0 percentage points; Fisher’s exact p = 0.0175). In paired analyses (n = 30), discordant events favored SLNE (matched OR 0.12, 95% CI 0.02–1.00; exact McNemar p = 0.039). LOS was longer after completion ILND; the paired median within-patient difference was +6 days (Wilcoxon p = 0.000238), and unpaired analyses showed a mean difference of approximately +8.68 days (Welch’s t-test p = 0.00273). Completion ILND had higher 30-day rates of lymphocele, reoperation, readmission, infection, impaired wound healing, skin necrosis, and sepsis. Conclusion: In a guideline-aligned cN0, pT1b+ pathway, primary DSNB/SLNE was associated with substantially lower early perioperative burden than completion ILND after sentinel node positivity while identifying the subgroup requiring therapeutic escalation. These findings quantify the additional morbidity associated with escalation after positive sentinel staging rather than a head-to-head comparison of equivalent primary strategies.

1.
Stuiver
MM
,
Djajadiningrat
RS
,
Graafland
NM
,
Vincent
AD
,
Lucas
C
,
Horenblas
S
.
Early wound complications after inguinal lymphadenectomy in penile cancer: a historical cohort study and risk-factor analysis
.
Eur Urol
.
2013
;
64
(
3
):
486
92
.
2.
Nazzani
S
,
Catanzaro
M
,
Biasoni
D
,
Maccauro
M
,
Zaborra
C
,
Stagni
S
, et al
.
Clinical outcomes in clinical N0 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis according to nodal management: early, delayed or selective (following dynamic sentinel node biopsy) inguinal lymph-node dissection
.
J Urol
.
2021
;
206
(
2
):
354
63
.
3.
Brouwer
OR
,
Albersen
M
,
Parnham
A
,
Protzel
C
,
Pettaway
CA
,
Ayres
B
, et al
.
European Association of urology-American Society of Clinical Oncology collaborative guideline on penile cancer: 2023 update
.
Eur Urol
.
2023
;
83
(
6
):
548
60
.
4.
Wever
L
,
de Vries
HM
,
Dell'Oglio
P
,
van der Poel
HG
,
Donswijk
ML
,
Sikorska
K
, et al
.
Incidence and risk factor analysis of complications after sentinel node biopsy for penile cancer
.
BJU Int
.
2022
;
130
(
4
):
486
95
.
5.
Brouwer
OR
,
Rumble
RB
,
Ayres
B
,
Sánchez Martínez
DF
,
Oliveira
P
,
Spiess
PE
, et al
.
Penile cancer: EAU-ASCO collaborative guidelines update Q and A
.
JCO Oncol Pract
.
2024
;
20
(
1
):
33
7
.
6.
O'Brien
JS
,
Teh
J
,
Chen
K
,
Kelly
BD
,
Chee
J
,
Lawrentschuk
N
.
Dynamic sentinel lymph node biopsy for penile cancer: accuracy is in the technique
.
Urology
.
2022
;
164
:
e308
.
7.
Nemitz
L
,
Vincke
A
,
Michalik
B
,
Engels
S
,
Meyer
LM
,
Henke
RP
, et al
.
Radioisotope-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy in penile cancer: a long-term follow-up study
.
Front Oncol
.
2022
;
12
:
850905
.
8.
van Gennep
EJ
,
KleinJan
GH
,
Kuusk
T
,
Verdijk
RWA
,
Wit
EMK
,
van Rhijn
BWG
, et al
.
Sentinel lymph node staging in urological cancer surgery: advances in imaging, intra-operative detection and translational research
.
BJU Int
.
2024
.
9.
Leijte
JA
,
Hughes
B
,
Graafland
NM
,
Kroon
BK
,
Olmos
RA
,
Nieweg
OE
, et al
.
Two-center evaluation of dynamic sentinel node biopsy for squamous cell carcinoma of the penis
.
J Clin Oncol
.
2009
;
27
(
20
):
3325
9
.
10.
Sadeghi
R
,
Gholami
H
,
Zakavi
SR
,
Kakhki
VR
,
Tabasi
KT
,
Horenblas
S
.
Accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy for inguinal lymph node staging of penile squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature
.
J Urol
.
2012
;
187
(
1
):
25
31
.
11.
Wever
L
,
de Vries
HM
,
van der Poel
H
,
van Leeuwen
F
,
Horenblas
S
,
Brouwer
O
.
Minimally invasive evaluation of the clinically negative inguinal node in penile cancer: dynamic sentinel node biopsy
.
Urol Oncol
.
2022
;
40
(
6
):
209
14
.
12.
Jeanne-Julien
A
,
Bouchot
O
,
De Vergie
S
,
Branchereau
J
,
Perrouin-Verbe
MA
,
Rigaud
J
.
Morbidity and risk factors for complications of inguinal lymph node dissection in penile cancer
.
World J Urol
.
2023
;
41
(
1
):
109
18
.
13.
Gopman
JM
,
Djajadiningrat
RS
,
Baumgarten
AS
,
Espiritu
PN
,
Horenblas
S
,
Zhu
Y
, et al
.
Predicting postoperative complications of inguinal lymph node dissection for penile cancer in an international multicentre cohort
.
BJU Int
.
2015
;
116
(
2
):
196
201
.
14.
Koifman
L
,
Hampl
D
,
Koifman
N
,
Vides
AJ
,
Ornellas
AA
.
Radical open inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile carcinoma: surgical technique, early complications and late outcomes
.
J Urol
.
2013
;
190
(
6
):
2086
92
.
15.
Draeger
DL
,
Sievert
KD
,
Hakenberg
OW
.
Cross-sectional patient-reported outcome measuring of health-related quality of life with establishment of cancer- and treatment-specific functional and symptom scales in patients with penile cancer
.
Clin Genitourin Cancer
.
2018
;
16
(
6
):
e1215
e1220
.
16.
Sosnowski
R
,
Wolski
JK
,
Kulpa
M
,
Ziętalewicz
U
,
Kosowicz
M
,
Kalinowski
T
, et al
.
Assessment of quality of life in patients surgically treated for penile cancer: impact of aggressiveness in surgery
.
Eur J Oncol Nurs
.
2017
;
31
:
1
5
.
17.
Jakobsen
JK
.
Sentinel node methods in penile cancer - a historical perspective on development of modern concepts
.
Semin Nucl Med
.
2022
;
52
(
4
):
486
97
.
18.
Rodler
S
,
Kidess
MA
,
Westhofen
T
,
Kowalewski
KF
,
Belenchon
IR
,
Taratkin
M
, et al
.
A systematic review of new imaging technologies for robotic prostatectomy: from molecular imaging to augmented reality
.
J Clin Med
.
2023
;
12
(
16
):
5425
.
19.
Aydin
AM
,
Biben
E
,
Yu
A
,
Chakiryan
NH
,
Mehrazin
R
,
Spiess
PE
.
Minimally invasive management of inguinal lymph nodes in penile cancer: recent progress and remaining challenges
.
Cancers (Basel)
.
2024
;
16
(
17
):
2935
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Digital Version

Pay-Per-View Access
$45.00
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal