Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination

Background: Partial nephrectomy (PN) has evolved from an imperative to an elective procedure, now representing the standard of care for localized renal masses. The introduction of robotic surgery has expanded the feasibility and precision of minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery. The single-port (SP) robotic platform, specifically designed to operate through a single incision, aims to further minimize invasiveness and improve postoperative recovery and cosmetic outcomes. Early experiences with SP robot-assisted PN (SP-RAPN) demonstrated encouraging perioperative, oncological, and functional results comparable to those achieved with the multi-port (MP) approach. The retroperitoneal route, particularly through the lower anterior access (LAA), has shown anesthesiological and surgical advantages, including shorter operative times, reduced pain, and faster discharge. Comparative studies indicate similar safety and cancer-control outcomes between SP and MP-RAPN, with SP offering shorter hospital stays but slightly longer Warm Ischemia Times (WITs). Ongoing technological advancements, artificial intelligence (AI) integration, and refined patient selection tools are expected to further enhance the precision, reproducibility, and accessibility of SP-RAPN. Summary: SP-RAPN offers comparable oncological and functional outcomes to multi-port RAPN (MP-RAPN) while further reducing surgical invasiveness and improving cosmetic results. Careful patient selection remains crucial, with low- to intermediate-complexity tumors being most suitable during the early learning phase. Among the available access routes, retroperitoneal and LAA techniques have gained particular attention for their perioperative and anesthesiological benefits. Although SP-RAPN is associated with slightly longer WITs, it provides advantages in terms of postoperative pain, length of stay, and feasibility in outpatient settings. Ongoing technological innovations, including AI, advanced imaging, and improved robotic articulation, are expected to refine surgical precision and broaden adoption. Key Messages: SP-RAPN is a safe and feasible evolution of nephron-sparing surgery with outcomes comparable to MP-RAPN. The retroperitoneal and LAA approaches offer notable perioperative and anesthesiological advantages. Proper patient selection and structured training programs are key to optimizing outcomes and overcoming technical challenges. Future advances in robotic technology and digital integration will further enhance the role of SP-RAPN in minimally invasive urologic surgery.

1.
Porpiglia
F
,
Mari
A
,
Bertolo
R
,
Antonelli
A
,
Bianchi
G
,
Fidanza
F
, et al
.
Partial nephrectomy in clinical T1b renal tumors: multicenter comparative study of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted approach (the RECORd project)
.
Urology
.
2016
;
89
:
45
51
.
2.
You
C
,
Du
Y
,
Wang
H
,
Peng
L
,
Wei
T
,
Zhang
X
, et al
.
Laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis of surgical, oncological, and functional outcomes
.
Front Oncol
.
2020
;
10
:
583979
.
3.
White
WM
,
Haber
GP
,
Goel
RK
,
Crouzet
S
,
Stein
RJ
,
Kaouk
JH
.
Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases
.
Urology
.
2009
;
74
(
4
):
801
4
.
4.
Raman
JD
,
Bensalah
K
,
Bagrodia
A
,
Stern
JM
,
Cadeddu
JA
.
Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2007
;
70
(
6
):
1039
42
.
5.
Gill
IS
,
Advincula
AP
,
Aron
M
,
Caddedu
J
,
Canes
D
,
Curcillo
PG
2nd
, et al
.
Consensus statement of the consortium for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
.
Surg Endosc
.
2010
;
24
(
4
):
762
8
.
6.
Kaouk
JH
,
Goel
RK
,
Haber
GP
,
Crouzet
S
,
Stein
RJ
.
Robotic single-port transumbilical surgery in humans: initial report
.
BJU Int
.
2009
;
103
(
3
):
366
9
.
7.
Joseph
RA
,
Goh
AC
,
Cuevas
SP
,
Donovan
MA
,
Kauffman
MG
,
Salas
NA
, et al
.
“Chopstick” surgery: a novel technique improves surgeon performance and eliminates arm collision in robotic single-incision laparoscopic surgery
.
Surg Endosc
.
2010
;
24
(
6
):
1331
5
.
8.
Nelson
RJ
,
Chavali
JSS
,
Yerram
N
,
Babbar
P
,
Kaouk
JH
.
Current status of robotic single-port surgery
.
Urol Ann
.
2017
;
9
(
3
):
217
22
.
9.
Pyrgidis
N
,
Volz
Y
,
Ebner
B
,
Westhofen
T
,
Staehler
M
,
Chaloupka
M
, et al
.
Evolution of robotic urology in clinical practice from the beginning to now: results from the GRAND study register
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2025
;
11
(
1
):
109
17
.
10.
Kaouk
J
,
Garisto
J
,
Eltemamy
M
,
Bertolo
R
.
Pure single-site robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using the SP surgical system: initial clinical experience
.
Urology
.
2019
;
124
:
282
5
.
11.
Francavilla
S
,
Abern
MR
,
Dobbs
RW
,
Vigneswaran
HT
,
Talamini
S
,
Antonelli
A
, et al
.
Single-Port robot assisted partial nephrectomy: initial experience and technique with the da Vinci Single-Port platform (IDEAL Phase 1)
.
Minerva Urol Nephrol
.
2022
;
74
(
2
):
216
24
.
12.
Shukla
D
,
Small
A
,
Mehrazin
R
,
Palese
M
.
Single-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: initial clinical experience and lessons learned for successful outcomes
.
J Robot Surg
.
2021
;
15
(
2
):
293
8
.
13.
Razdan
, et al
.
Developing an algorithm on multiport and single port use for robotic prostate and kidney surgery
.
American Urological Association
.
2024
: https://auanews.net/issues/articles/2024/march-2024/developing-an-algorithm-on-multiport-and-single-port-use-for-roboticprostate-and-kidney-surgery
14.
Soputro
NA
,
Okhawere
KE
,
Ramos-Carpinteyro
R
,
Sauer Calvo
R
,
Wang
Y
,
Manfredi
C
, et al
.
Development of patient-specific nomogram to assist in clinical decision-making for single port versus multi-port robotic partial nephrectomy: a report from the single port advanced robotic consortium
.
J Endourol
.
2025
;
39
(
3
):
252
60
.
15.
Davidiuk
AJ
,
Parker
AS
,
Thomas
CS
,
Leibovich
BC
,
Castle
EP
,
Heckman
MG
, et al
.
Mayo adhesive probability score: an accurate image-based scoring system to predict adherent perinephric fat in partial nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol
.
2014
;
66
(
6
):
1165
71
.
16.
Borregales
LD
,
Adibi
M
,
Thomas
AZ
,
Reis
RB
,
Chery
LJ
,
Devine
CE
, et al
.
Predicting adherent perinephric fat using preoperative clinical and radiological factors in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2021
;
7
(
2
):
397
403
.
17.
Macleod
LC
,
Hsi
RS
,
Gore
JL
,
Wright
JL
,
Harper
JD
.
Perinephric fat thickness is an independent predictor of operative complexity during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
.
J Endourol
.
2014
;
28
(
5
):
587
91
.
18.
Larcher
A
,
Muttin
F
,
Peyronnet
B
,
De Naeyer
G
,
Khene
ZE
,
Dell'Oglio
P
, et al
.
The learning curve for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: impact of surgical experience on perioperative outcomes
.
Eur Urol
.
2019
;
75
(
2
):
253
6
.
19.
Fiorello
N
,
Di Benedetto
A
,
Summonti
D
,
Mogorovich
A
,
Sepich
CA
.
Learning curve in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: comparison between an expert surgeon and a team in training in single-center experiences
.
Cent Eur J Urol
.
2021
;
74
(
4
):
523
7
.
20.
Licari
LC
,
Bologna
E
,
Franco
A
,
Ditonno
F
,
Manfredi
C
,
Huang
J
, et al
.
Single-port vs multi-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single center propensity score-matched analysis
.
Eur J Surg Oncol
.
2024
;
50
(
3
):
108011
.
21.
Mehrazin
R
,
Ranti
D
,
Altschuler
J
.
Early perioperative outcomes of single-port compared to multi-port robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy
.
J Robot Surg
.
2023
;
17
(
5
):
2409
14
.
22.
Billah
M
,
Sheckley
F
,
Nguyen
J
,
Iarajuli
T
,
Raver
M
,
Rudnick
B
, et al
.
Single port modified partial nephrectomy: novel simultaneous access to peritoneal and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy, initial clinical experience
.
J Endourol
.
2024
;
38
(
5
):
444
9
.
23.
Pellegrino
AA
,
Chen
G
,
Morgantini
L
,
Calvo
RS
,
Crivellaro
S
.
Simplifying retroperitoneal robotic single-port surgery: novel supine anterior retroperitoneal access
.
Eur Urol
.
2023
;
84
(
2
):
223
8
.
24.
Homewood
D
,
Tan
N
,
Fay
T
,
Silagy
A
,
Lawrentschuk
N
,
Corcoran
NM
, et al
.
An overview of renorrhaphy techniques for partial nephrectomy
.
Int J Urol
.
2025
;
32
(
4
):
329
40
.
25.
Kälble
S
,
Engelmann
SU
,
Schrutz
H
,
Zeman
F
,
Rinderknecht
E
,
Haas
M
, et al
.
Randomised controlled feasibility trial of retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: the ROPARN study
.
BJU Int
.
2025
;
135
(
6
):
977
86
.
26.
Socarrás
MR
,
Elbers
JR
,
Rivas
JG
,
Autran
AM
,
Esperto
F
,
Tortolero
L
, et al
.
Retroperitoneal robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (rRAPN): surgical technique and review
.
Curr Urol Rep
.
2021
;
22
(
6
):
33
.
27.
Raver
M
,
Ahmed
M
,
Okhawere
KE
,
Saini
I
,
Chaturvedi
R
,
Patel
M
, et al
.
Adoption of single-port robotic partial nephrectomy increases utilization of the retroperitoneal approach: a report from the single-port advanced research consortium
.
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech
.
2025
;
35
(
2
):
131
7
.
28.
Yang
X
,
Yu
H
,
Chen
H
,
Liu
P
,
Tao
Y
,
Bai
R
, et al
.
Safety and feasibility of prone retroperitoneal robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (prRAPN): a novel posterior approach and perioperative results–a prospective study
.
World J Urol
.
2025
;
43
(
1
):
376
.
29.
Lambertini
L
,
Pacini
M
,
Calvo
RS
,
Torres Anguiano
JR
,
Cannoletta
D
,
Pettenuzzo
G
, et al
.
Retroperitoneal single port vs. transperitoneal multiport robot assisted partial nephrectomy in patients with highly hostile abdomen: com-parative analysis from a tertiary care center
.
Minerva Urol Nephrol
.
2025
;
77
(
2
):
209
16
.
30.
Zillioux
JM
,
Krupski
TL
.
Patient positioning during minimally invasive surgery: what is current best practice
.
Robot Surg
.
2017
;
4
:
69
76
.
31.
Glassman
DT
,
Merriam
WG
,
Trabulsi
EJ
,
Byrne
D
,
Gomella
L
.
Rhabdomyolysis after laparoscopic nephrectomy
.
JSLS
.
2007
;
11
(
4
):
432
7
.
32.
Tameze
Y
,
Low
YH
.
Outpatient robotic surgery: considerations for the anesthesiologist
.
Adv Anesth
.
2022
;
40
(
1
):
15
32
.
33.
Lambertini
L
,
Pacini
M
,
Polverino
P
,
Wilkinson
NR
,
Calvo
RS
,
Cannoletta
D
, et al
.
The anesthesiologic impact of single-port robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a tertiary referral comparative analysis between full-flank transperitoneal, retroperitoneal, and supine Lower Anterior Access (LAA)
.
J Pers Med
.
2025
;
15
(
7
):
306
.
34.
Cannoletta
D
,
Pellegrino
AA
,
Pettenuzzo
G
,
Morgantini
L
,
Calvo
RS
,
Torres-Anguiano
JR
, et al
.
Surgical outcomes of novel retroperitoneal low anterior vs posterior and transperitoneal access in single-port partial nephrectomy
.
World J Urol
.
2024
;
42
(
1
):
387
.
35.
Cannoletta
D
,
Pettenuzzo
G
,
Pellegrino
AA
,
Morgantini
L
,
Calvo Sauer
R
,
Torres Anguiano
JR
, et al
.
Versatility of single port retroperitoneal low anterior access: early outcomes in multiple procedures
.
J Endourol
.
2024
;
38
(
7
):
668
74
.
36.
Li
K-P
,
Chen
SY
,
Wang
CY
,
Yang
L
.
Perioperative and oncologic outcomes of single-port versus conventional robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: an evidence-based analysis of comparative outcomes
.
J Robot Surg
.
2023
;
17
(
3
):
765
77
.
37.
Nguyen
TT
,
Ngo
XT
,
Duong
NX
,
Dobbs
RW
,
Vuong
HG
,
Nguyen
DD
, et al
.
Single-port vs multiport robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis
.
J Endourol
.
2024
;
38
(
3
):
253
61
.
38.
Antonelli
AD
,
Cindolo
L
,
Sandri
M
,
Veccia
A
,
Annino
F
,
Bertagna
F
, et al
.
The role of warm ischemia time on functional outcomes after robotic partial nephrectomy: a radionuclide renal scan study from the clock randomized trial
.
World J Urol
.
2023
;
41
(
5
):
1337
44
.
39.
Tanabalan
C
,
Raman
A
,
Mumtaz
F
.
Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: how to minimise renal ischaemia
.
Arab J Urol
.
2018
;
16
(
3
):
350
6
.
40.
Wang
K
,
Xu
C
,
Deng
Y
,
Yan
R
,
Wang
H
,
Zhang
Y
, et al
.
Single-port vs multi-port retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: a meta-analysis of perioperative and functional outcomes
.
J Robot Surg
.
2025
;
19
(
1
):
643
.
41.
Santarelli
V
,
Valenzi
FM
,
Haberal
HB
,
Morgantini
LA
,
Torres-Anguiano
JR
,
Del Giudice
F
, et al
.
A Single Port (SP) approach reduces the risk of postoperative complications in elderly patients undergoing robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN)
.
Cancers
.
2025
;
17
(
8
):
1324
.
42.
Mehrazin
R
,
Bortnick
E
,
Say
R
,
Winoker
JS
.
Ambulatory robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: safety and feasibility study
.
Urology
.
2020
;
143
:
137
41
.
43.
Ravivarapu
KT
,
Garden
E
,
Chin
CP
,
Levy
M
,
Al-Alao
O
,
Sewell-Araya
J
, et al
.
Same-day discharge following minimally invasive partial and radical nephrectomy: a National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) analysis
.
World J Urol
.
2022
;
40
(
10
):
2473
9
.
44.
Abaza
R
,
Murphy
C
,
Bsatee
A
,
Brown
DH
Jr
,
Martinez
O
.
Single-port robotic surgery allows same-day discharge in majority of cases
.
Urology
.
2021
;
148
:
159
65
.
45.
Gupta
R
,
Eraky
A
,
Elkun
Y
,
Gassmann
K
,
Mehrazin
R
.
Comparative outcomes of multi-port versus single-port robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy with same-day discharge: impact of surgical approach
.
J Robot Surg
.
2025
;
19
:
374
.
46.
Lasorsa
F
,
Orsini
A
,
Bignante
G
,
Biasatti
A
,
Dymanus
KA
,
Feldman-Schultz
O
, et al
.
Predictors of delayed hospital discharge after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: the impact of single-port robotic surgery
.
World J Urol
.
2024
;
43
(
1
):
30
.
47.
Krishnan
N
,
Zappia
J
,
Calaway
A
,
Nagle
RT
,
Sundaram
CP
,
Boris
RS
.
Identifying preoperative predictors of operative time and their impact on outcomes in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
.
J Endourol
.
2022
;
36
(
1
):
71
6
.
48.
Wald
G
,
Gereta
S
,
Laviana
AA
,
Hu
JC
.
Time-driven activity-based costing and outcomes of same-day discharge vs inpatient robotic partial and radical nephrectomy
.
Urology
.
2024
;
188
:
11
7
.
49.
Wood
A
,
Jivanji
D
,
Kaplan-Marans
E
,
Katlowitz
E
,
Lubin
M
,
Teper
E
, et al
.
Same-day discharge after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: is it worth it
.
J Endourol
.
2023
;
37
(
3
):
297
303
.
50.
Pellegrino
AA
,
Calvo
RS
,
Pellegrino
F
,
Morgantini
L
,
Briganti
A
,
Montorsi
F
, et al
.
Outpatient vs inpatient single-port robotic urologic surgery: perioperative outcomes and complications
.
Urol Pract
.
2024
;
11
(
2
):
422
9
.
51.
Bernhard
JC
,
Robert
G
,
Ricard
S
,
Michiels
C
,
Capon
G
,
Boulenger de Hautecloque
A
, et al
.
Day-case robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: feasibility and preliminary results of a prospective evaluation (UroCCR-25 AMBU-REIN study)
.
World J Urol
.
2022
;
40
(
6
):
1351
7
.
52.
Sadanala
ME
,
George
AJP
,
Mukherjee
P
,
Nirmal
TJ
.
Is 23-h discharge following robotic radical prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy feasible and safe in a quaternary care center in a developing country
.
Indian J Urol
.
2025
;
41
(
3
):
195
203
.
53.
Orsini
A
,
Lasorsa
F
,
Bignante
G
,
Marchioni
M
,
Schips
L
,
Lucarelli
G
, et al
.
Outpatient robotic urological surgery: an evidence-based analysis
.
Eur Urol Focus
.
2025
;
11
(
2
):
337
46
.
54.
Ditonno
F
, et al
.
Single port partial nephrectomy: techniques and outcomes
.
Mini-Invasive Surgery
;
2023
.
55.
Fasanella
D
Intraoperative imaging techniques for robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: where do we stand
.
Mini-Invasive Surgery
;
2024
.
56.
Katsimperis
S
,
Tzelves
L
,
Feretzakis
G
,
Bellos
T
,
Tsikopoulos
I
,
Kostakopoulos
N
, et al
.
Innovations in robot-assisted surgery for genitourinary cancers: emerging technologies and clinical applications
.
Appl Sci
.
2025
;
15
(
11
):
6118
.
57.
Saikali
S
,
Ma
R
,
Patel
V
,
Hung
A
.
Clinical applications of artificial intelligence in robotic urologic surgery
.
Asian J Urol
.
2025
;
12
(
2
):
139
42
.
58.
Croghan
SM
,
Voborsky
M
,
Roche
AF
,
Condron
C
,
O'Keeffe
DA
,
McGuire
BB
.
Design and utilisation of a novel, high-fidelity, low-cost, hybrid-tissue simulation model to facilitate training in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy
.
J Robot Surg
.
2024
;
18
(
1
):
103
.
You do not currently have access to this content.
Don't already have an account? Register

Digital Version

Pay-Per-View Access
$45.00
1 Karger Article Bundle Token
$170
Rental

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal