Introduction: Urethral strictures generate great morbidity. Two procedures have been described for their management - laser and cold knife techniques - which are still widely used. We aim to assess the safety and efficacy of laser versus cold knife urethrotomy. Materials and Methods: We conducted a systematic search of the literature using MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS and Cochrane databases and gray literature. Primary outcomes were urethral stricture recurrence, time-to-recurrence and complication rate. Secondary outcomes were quality of life and maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax). Data analysis was obtained using Review Manager 5.2. Results: Out of 137 publications, 4 articles were included in the meta-analysis. At 3 months, the recurrence rate was similar in both groups (0.55, 95% CI 0.18-1.66), but at 6 and 12 months, it was significantly lower in the laser urethrotomy group (0.39, 95% CI 0.19-0.81 and 0.44, 95% CI 0.26-0.75). The analysis of Qmax at 6 months post-intervention suggested a greater improvement in the laser urethrotomy group. A qualitative analysis showed that complications in both procedures were minor and infrequent. Conclusions: Laser urethrotomy has a lower recurrence rate at 6 and 12 months compared to cold knife urethrotomy. Complications in both procedures are minor and infrequent. Results should be interpreted cautiously, since they were evaluated only for a short term.

Keywords:
Urethra, Urethral stricture, Urethral stenosis, Laser, Cold knife, Urethrotomy, Urethral reconstruction, Efficacy, Safety, Recurrence rate
1.
Brandes SB, Morey AF: Advanced Male Urethral and Genital Reconstructive Surgery. New York, Springer New York, 2014.
2.
Santucci RA, Joyce GF, Wise M: Male urethral stricture disease. J Urol 2007;177:1667-1674.
3.
Tritschler S, Roosen A, Füllhase C, Stief CG, Rübben H: Urethral stricture: etiology, investigation and treatments. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2013;110:220-226.
4.
Zhou SK, Zhang J, Sa YL, Jin SB, Xu YM, Fu Q, et al: Etiology and management of male iatrogenic urethral stricture: retrospective analysis of 172 cases in a single medical center. Urol Int 2016;97:386-391.
5.
Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Partin AW, Peters CA: Campbell-Walsh Urology 11th Edition. Philadelphia, Elsevier, 2016.
6.
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG: The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357:1191-1194.
7.
Atak M, Tokgöz H, Akduman B, Erol B, Dönmez I, Hancı V, et al: Low-power holmium:YAG laser urethrotomy for urethral stricture disease: comparison of outcomes with the cold-knife technique. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2011;27:503-507.
8.
Jain SK, Kaza RC, Singh BK: Evaluation of holmium laser versus cold knife in optical internal urethrotomy for the management of short segment urethral stricture. Urol Ann 2014;6:328-333.
9.
Jabłonowski Z, Kedzierski R, et al: Comparison of neodymium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet laser treatment with cold knife endoscopic incision of urethral strictures in male patients. Photomed Laser Surg 2010;28:239-244.
10.
Dutkiewicz SA, Wroblewski M: Comparison of treatment results between holmium laser endourethrotomy and optical internal urethrotomy for urethral stricture. Int Urol Nephrol 2012;44:717-724.
11.
Gallegos MA, Santucci RA: Advances in urethral stricture management. F1000Res 2016;5:2913.
12.
Xue JD, Xie H, Fu Q, Feng C, Guo H, Xu YM: Single-staged improved tubularized preputial/penile skin flap urethroplasty for obliterated anterior urethral stricture: long-term results. Urol Int 2016;96:231-237.
13.
Bullock TL, Brandes SB: Adult anterior urethral strictures: a national practice patterns survey of board certified urologists in the United States. J Urol 2007;177:685-690.
14.
Carreño G, Patiño G, Perez J: Estado de la urología reconstructiva en Colombia: Tendencias en el tratamiento de la estrechez uretral anterior, una encuesta nacional. Congr SCU, 2016.
15.
Buckley JC, Heyns C, Gilling P, Carney J: SIU/ICUD consultation on urethral strictures: dilation, internal urethrotomy, and stenting of male anterior urethral strictures. Urology 2014;83(3 suppl):S18-S22.
16.
Ogbonna BC: Managing many patients with a urethral stricture: a cost-benefit analysis of treatment options. Br J Urol 1998;81:741-744.
17.
Greenwell TJ, Castle C, Andrich DE, MacDonald JT, Nicol DL, Mundy AR: Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective. J Urol 2004;172:275-277.
18.
Jin T, Li H, Jiang LH, Wang L, Wang KJ: Safety and efficacy of laser and cold knife urethrotomy for urethral stricture. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123:1589-1595.
19.
Wessells H, Angermeier KW, Elliott S, Gonzalez CM, Kodama R, Peterson AC, et al: Male urethral stricture: American urological association guideline. J Urol 2017;197:182-190.
20.
Vicente J, Salvador J, Caffaratti J: Endoscopic urethrotomy versus urethrotomy plus Nd-YAG laser in the treatment of urethral stricture. Eur Urol 1990;18:166-168.
© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
2017
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.