Introduction: The probability of prostate cancer detection is related to the amount of tissue represented. For optimal tissue representation, the specimens should preserve their regular cylindrical shape and avoid artefacts and deformation caused by fixation and preembedding. The aim of our study was to compare contemporary preembedding methods including a new method of using thick cardboard. Materials and Methods: To compare the preembedding methods, we took 36 nonfragmented cores from fresh prostatectomy specimens for each method, fixed them in formalin and made histological slides. The comparison criteria were a core section area in the middle section and the number of fragments per core after processing. Results: Two methods (preembedding on the edge of thick cardboard and on biplicated paper) provided a bigger section area of specimens. The differences in amounts of fragments were very small among the methods mentioned above and the preembedding glass with grooves, but preembedding between two sponges in a histological cassette showed higher fragmentation. Conclusions: Preembedding on the edge of thick cardboard and on biplicated paper can be recommended as effective methods of prostate biopsy core fixation. Paper or cardboard for fixation of prostate biopsy cores should be presoaked with formalin or normal saline.

Keywords:
Prostate biopsy, Prostate cancer, Handling of biopsy core, Needle biopsy, Preembedding method, Tissue sampling
1.
Fiset PO, Aprikian A, Brimo F: Length of prostate biopsy cores: does it impact cancer detection? Can J Urol 2013;20:6848-6853.
2.
Iczkowski KA, Casella G, Seppala RJ, Jones GL, Mishler BA, Qian J, Bostwick DG: Needle core length in sextant biopsy influences prostate cancer detection rate. Urology 2002;59:698-703.
3.
Ficarra V, Martignoni G, Novella G, Cerruto MA, Galfano A, Novara G, Pea M, Artibani W: Needle core length is a quality indicator of systematic transperineal prostate biopsy. Eur Urol 2006;50:266-271.
4.
Varma M, Berney DM, Algaba F, Camparo P, Compérat E, Griffiths DF, Kristiansen G, Lopez-Beltran A, Montironi R, Egevad L: Prostate needle biopsy processing: a survey of laboratory practice across Europe. J Clin Pathol 2013;66:120-123.
5.
Humphrey PA, Walther PJ: Adenocarcinoma of the prostate. I. Tissue sampling considerations. Am J Clin Pathol 1993;99:746-759.
6.
Boccon-Gibod L, van der Kwast TH, Montironi R, Boccon-Gibod L, Bono A: Handling and pathology reporting of prostate biopsies. Eur Urol 2004;46:177-181.
7.
Mottet N, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, van den Bergh RCN, Bolla M, van Casteren NJ, Cornford P, Joniau S, Mason MD, Matveev V, van der Kwast TH, van der Poel H, Rouviere O, Wiegel T: Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. European Association of Urology 2014, update April 2014. http://www.uroweb.org/gls/pdf/1607%20Prostate%20Cancer_LRV3.pdf.
8.
Van der Kwast T, Bubendorf L, Mazerolles C, Raspollini MR, Van Leenders GJ, Pihl CG, Kujala P: Guidelines on processing and reporting of prostate biopsies: the 2013 update of the pathology committee of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC). Virchows Arch 2013;463:367-377.
9.
Italian Panel on Prostate Biopsy: Consensus-based guidelines on prostate biopsy (in Italian). Arch Ital Urol Androl 2005;(3 suppl 1):1-2, preceding 1.
10.
Minardi D, Galosi A, Dell'Atti L, Yehia M, Montironi R, Polite M, Muzzonigro G: A method to improve histopathological analysis of prostate biopsies: the ‘sandwich' technique. Eur Urol Suppl 2002;1:118.
11.
Galosi AB, Montironi R, Mazzuchelli R, Muzzonigro G: Clinical pathology of prostate cancer: focus on diagnosis, predictive and prognostic factors and quality indicators. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2007;79:45-51.
12.
Urbanskii AI, Markochev AB, Plekhanov AIu, Zhivov AV, Shkol'nik MI, Galanin SV, Romanovskii VM: Technical improvement of the prostate thick-needle biopsy (in Russian). Arkh Patol 2005;67:50-51.
13.
Pryalukhin A, Topuzov M, Urbansky A: An optimized method for fixation of prostate core needle biopsy specimens. Eur Urol Suppl 2008;7:807.
14.
Topuzov ME, Prjalukhin AE, Urbanskij AI: Histological sample fixation technique. Patent RU 2362491 C1, issued July 27, 2009.
15.
Shaw EB, Daniel BW, Wofford ED, Carter JB: Prostate biopsies: optimized cancer detection and staging. J S C Med Assoc 1996;92:261-266.
16.
Lane RB Jr, Lane CG, Mangold KA, Johnson MH, Allsbrook WC Jr: Needle biopsies of the prostate: what constitutes adequate histologic sampling? Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:833-835.
17.
Rogatsch H, Moser P, Volgger H, Horninger W, Bartsch G, Mikuz G, Mairinger T: Diagnostic effect of an improved preembedding method of prostate needle biopsy specimens. Hum Pathol 2000;31:1102-1107.
18.
Rogatsch H, Mairinger T, Horninger W, Gschwendtner A, Bartsch G, Mikuz G: Optimized preembedding method improves the histologic yield of prostatic core needle biopsies. Prostate 2000;42:124-129.
19.
Muzzonigro G, Galosi AB, Milanese G, Dellabella M, Montironi R: Fragments of prostatic biopsy: characteristics, dimensions, and number (in Italian). Arch Ital Urol Androl 2000;72:145-149.
20.
Galosi AB, Dellabella M, Polito M Jr, Yehia M, Dell'Atti L, Montironi R, Muzzonigro G: A new method for embedding fragments of prostate biopsy: the ‘sandwich' technique. Preliminary experience. Urologia 2001;68:170-174.
21.
Galosi AB, Muzzonigro G: Methods to obtain more clinical and pathologic information from needle core biopsy of the prostate gland. Ann NY Acad Sci 2002;963:218-220.
22.
Wullich B, Füssel S, Grobholz R: Optimized standards for prostate biopsy (in German). Urologe A 2007;46:675-682.
23.
Farcas C, Dumitrescu M, Amuzescu B, Jinga V, Radavoi G, Mischianu D, Geavlete B, Petrescu A, Musat S: A new method for simultaneous processing and analysis of prostate core biopsies. Urology 2012;80(suppl):285.
24.
Musat S: Matrix for receiving a tissue sample and use thereof. Patent WO 2013/002661 A1, issued January 3, 2013.
25.
Kepes JJ, Oswald O: Tissue artefacts caused by sponge in embedding cassettes. Am J Surg Pathol 1991;15:810-812.
26.
Farrell DJ, Thompson PJ, Morley AR: Tissue artefacts caused by sponges. J Clin Pathol 1992;45:923-924.
27.
Kao J, Upton M, Zhang P, Rosen S: Individual prostate biopsy core embedding facilitates maximal tissue representation. J Urol 2002;168:496-499.
28.
Dogan HS, Eskicorapci SY, Ertoy-Baydar D, Akdogan B, Gunay LM, Ozen H: Can we obtain better specimens with an end-cutting prostatic biopsy device? Eur Urol 2005;47:297-301.
29.
Mondet F, Oddou JH, Boyer C, Corsois L, Collomb D: Development of a pathological quality score of prostate biopsies (in French). Prog Urol 2009;19:107-111.
30.
Reis LO, Reinato JA, Silva DC, Matheus WE, Denardi F, Ferreira U: The impact of core biopsy fragmentation in prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2010;42:965-969.
31.
Kuru TH, Simpfendörfer T, Roethke M, Hohenfellner M, Hadaschik BA: Improving accuracy in image-guided prostate biopsy by using trocar-sharpened needles. Urol Int 2013;91:404-409.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.