Objective: This randomized controlled study compared a novel transparent urinary tract simulator with the traditional opaque urinary tract simulator as an aid for efficiently teaching urological surgical procedures. Methods: Senior medical students were tested on their understanding of urological theory before and after lectures concerning urinary system disease. The students received operative training using the transparent urinary tract simulator (experimental group, n = 80) or the J3311 opaque plastic urinary tract simulator (control, n = 80), specifically in catheterization and retrograde double-J stent implantation. The operative training was followed by a skills test and student satisfaction survey. Results: The test scores for theory were similar between the two groups, before and after training. Students in the experimental group performed significantly better than those in the control group on the procedural skills test, and also had significantly better self-directed learning skills, analytical skills, and greater motivation to learn. Conclusion: During the initial step of training, the novel transparent urinary tract simulator significantly improved the efficiency of teaching urological procedural skills compared with the traditional opaque device.

Keywords:
Medical education, Urinary tract simulator, Medical simulator, Catheterization, Ureteroscope, Cystoscopy
1.
Buscarini M, Stein JP: Training the urologic oncologist of the future: where are the challenges? Urol Oncol 2009;27:193-198.
2.
Wu EH, Elnicki DM, Alper EJ, Bost JE, Corbett EC Jr, Fagan MJ, Mechaber AJ, Ogden PE, Sebastian JL, Torre DM: Procedural and interpretive skills of medical students: experiences and attitudes of fourth-year students. Acad Med 2008;83:S63-S67.
3.
Yang RL, Reinke CE, Mittal MK, Kean CR, Diaz E, Fishman NO, Morris JB, Kelz RR: The surgery clerkship: an opportunity for preclinical credentialing in urinary catheterization. Am J Surg 2012;204:535-539.
4.
Leser R, Baca A, Uhlig J: Effectiveness of multimedia-supported education in practical sports courses. J Sports Sci Med 2011;10:184-192.
5.
Brehmer M, Tolley D: Validation of a bench model for endoscopic surgery in the upper urinary tract. Eur Urol 2002;42:175-179; discussion 180.
6.
Tortora GJ, Grabowski SR: Principles of Anatomy and Physiology, ed 9. New York, John Wiley and Sons, 2000.
7.
Chew BH, Lange D: In vivo evaluation of the third generation biodegradable stent: a novel approach to avoiding the forgotten stent syndrome. J Urol 2013, Epub ahead of print.
8.
Li J, Li QL, Chen ML, Xie HF, Li YP, Chen X: Comparison of three problem-based learning conditions (real patients, digital and paper) with lecture-based learning in a dermatology course: a prospective randomized study from china. Med Teach 2013;35:e963-e970.
9.
Fonseca AL, Evans LV, Gusberg RJ: Open surgical simulation in residency training: a review of its status and a case for its incorporation. J Surg Educ 2013;70:129-137.
10.
Bradley P: The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Med Educ 2006;40:254-262.
11.
White MA, Dehaan AP, Stephens DD, Maes AA, Maatman TJ: Validation of a high fidelity adult ureteroscopy and renoscopy simulator. J Urol 2010;183:673-677.
12.
Riley JB, Austin JW, Holt DW, Searles BE, Darling EM: Internet-based virtual classroom and educational management software enhance students' didactic and clinical experiences in perfusion education programs. J Extra Corpor Technol 2004;36:235-239.
13.
Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Canales C, McDougall EM, Lin S: High fidelity simulation based team training in urology: a preliminary interdisciplinary study of technical and nontechnical skills in laparoscopic complications management. J Urol 2012;187:1385-1391.
14.
Papatsoris AG, Shaikh T, Patel D, Bourdoumis A, Bach C, Buchholz N, Masood J, Junaid I: Use of a virtual reality simulator to improve percutaneous renal access skills: a prospective study in urology trainees. Urol Int 2012;89:185-190.
15.
Brim NM, Venkatan SK, Gordon JA, Alexander EK: Long-term educational impact of a simulator curriculum on medical student education in an internal medicine clerkship. Simul Healthc 2010;5:75-81.
16.
Matsumoto ED: Low-fidelity ureteroscopy models. J Endourol 2007;21:248-251.
17.
Matsumoto ED, Pace KT, D'A Honey RJ : Virtual reality ureteroscopy simulator as a valid tool for assessing endourological skills. Int J Urol 2006;13:896-901.
18.
Varkey P, Murad MH, Braun C, Grall KJ, Saoji V: A review of cost-effectiveness, cost-containment and economics curricula in graduate medical education. J Eval Clin Pract 2010;16:1055-1062.
19.
Liu Y, Glass NL, Glover CD, Power RW, Watcha MF: Comparison of the development of performance skills in ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia simulations with different phantom models. Simul Healthc 2013;8:368-375.
20.
Tunc L, Resorlu B, Unsal A, Oguz U, Diri A, Gozen AS, Bedir S, Ozgok Y: In vivo porcine model for practicing retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urol Int 2014;92:64-67.
© 2015 S. Karger AG, Basel
2015
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.