Objective: The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the evidence of the effect of pelvic floor muscle training on urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. Methods: A bibliographic search was conducted in four databases. Studies were grouped according to the intervention program (muscle training versus control and individual home-based versus physiotherapist-guided muscle training). Results: Eight studies were selected for meta-analysis after satisfying the selection criteria. The data show that pelvic floor muscle training improves continence rate in the short (RR = 2.16; p < 0.001), medium (RR = 1.45; p = 0.001) and long term (RR = 1.23; p = 0.019) after surgery. The number of randomized controlled trials and the heterogeneity in the study population and type of pelvic floor muscle training were the main limitations. Conclusion: Programs including at least three sets of 10 repetitions of muscle training daily appear to improve continence rate after radical prostatectomy. Our meta-analysis shows that muscle training programs for urinary incontinence provide similar results to those of physiotherapist-guided programs, therefore being more cost- effective.

Keywords:
Prostatectomy, Urinary incontinence, Pelvic floor muscle training, Biofeedback
1.
Ferlay J, Parkin DM, Steliarova-Foucher E: Estimates of cancer incidence and mortality in Europe in 2008. Eur J Cancer 2010;46:765-781.
2.
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence: Prostate Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment CG175. London, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014.
3.
Sacco E, Prayer-Galetti T, Pinto F, Fracalanza S, Betto G, Pagano F, et al: Urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy: incidence by definition, risk factors and temporal trend in a large series with a long-term follow-up. BJU Int 2006;97:1234-1241.
4.
Glazener C, Boachie C, Buckley B, Cochran C, Dorey G, Grant A, et al: Conservative treatment for urinary incontinence in Men After Prostate Surgery (MAPS): two parallel randomised controlled trials. Health Technol Assess 2011;15:1-290.
5.
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, Griffiths D, Rosier P, Ulmsten U, et al: The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society. Neurourol Urodyn 2002;21:167-178.
6.
Penson DF, McLerran D, Feng Z, Li L, Albertsen PC, Gilliland FD, et al: 5-year urinary and sexual outcomes after radical prostatectomy: results from the prostate cancer outcomes study. J Urol 2005;173:1701-1705.
7.
Moore KN, Estey A: The early post-operative concerns of men after radical prostatectomy. J Adv Nurs 1999;29:1121-1129.
8.
Bettez M, Tu le M, Carlson K, Corcos J, Gajewski J, Jolivet M, et al: 2012 update: guidelines for adult urinary incontinence collaborative consensus document for the Canadian Urological Association. Can Urol Assoc J 2012;6:354-363.
9.
Hammerer P, Huland H: Urodynamic evaluation of changes in urinary control after radical retropubic prostatectomy. J Urol 1997;157:233-236.
10.
Smither AR, Guralnick ML, Davis NB, See WA: Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using objective pad test data. BMC Urol 2007;7:2.
11.
Ribeiro LH, Prota C, Gomes CM, de Bessa J Jr, Boldarine MP, Dall'Oglio MF, et al: Long-term effect of early postoperative pelvic floor biofeedback on continence in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2010;184:1034-1039.
12.
Abrams P, Andersson KE, Birder L, Brubaker L, Cardozo L, Chapple C, et al: Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse, and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn 2010;29:213-240.
13.
Campbell SE, Glazener C, Hunter KF, Cody JD, Moore KN: Conservative management for postprostatectomy urinary incontinence. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;1: CD001843.
14.
Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gotzsche PC, Ioannidis JP, et al: The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. BMJ 2009;339:b2700.
15.
Rowe V, Hemmings S, Barton C, Malliaras P, Maffulli N, Morrissey D: Conservative management of midportion Achilles tendinopathy: a mixed methods study, integrating systematic review and clinical reasoning. Sports Med 2012;42:941-967.
16.
Clark IN, Taylor NF, Baker F: Music interventions and physical activity in older adults: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Rehabil Med 2012;44:710-719.
17.
Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M: Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003;83:713-721.
18.
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG: Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557-560.
19.
Egger M, Smith GD: Misleading meta-analysis. BMJ 1995;310:752-754.
20.
Filocamo MT, Li Marzi V, Del Popolo G, Cecconi F, Marzocco M, Tosto A, et al: Effectiveness of early pelvic floor rehabilitation treatment for post-prostatectomy incontinence. Eur Urol 2005;48:734-738.
21.
Manassero F, Traversi C, Ales V, Pistolesi D, Panicucci E, Valent F, et al: Contribution of early intensive prolonged pelvic floor exercises on urinary continence recovery after bladder neck-sparing radical prostatectomy: results of a prospective controlled randomized trial. Neurourol Urodyn 2007;26:985-989.
22.
Goode PS, Burgio KL, Johnson TM 2nd, Clay OJ, Roth DL, Markland AD, et al: Behavioral therapy with or without biofeedback and pelvic floor electrical stimulation for persistent postprostatectomy incontinence: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2011;305:151-159.
23.
Van Kampen M, De Weerdt W, Van Poppel H, De Ridder D, Feys H, Baert L: Effect of pelvic-floor re-education on duration and degree of incontinence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:98-102.
24.
Moore KN, Valiquette L, Chetner MP, Byrniak S, Herbison GP: Return to continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized trial of verbal and written instructions versus therapist-directed pelvic floor muscle therapy. Urology 2008;72:1280-1286.
25.
Overgard M, Angelsen A, Lydersen S, Morkved S: Does physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle training reduce urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy? A randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol 2008;54:438-448.
26.
Dubbelman Y, Groen J, Wildhagen M, Rikken B, Bosch R: The recovery of urinary continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized trial comparing the effect of physiotherapist-guided pelvic floor muscle exercises with guidance by an instruction folder only. BJU Int 2010;106:515-522.
27.
Burgio KL, Goode PS, Urban DA, Umlauf MG, Locher JL, Bueschen A, et al: Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioral training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol 2006;175:196-201.
28.
Carrière B, Markel Feldt C: The Pelvic Floor. Stuttgart, Thieme, 2006.
29.
Floratos DL, Sonke GS, Rapidou CA, Alivizatos GJ, Deliveliotis C, Constantinides CA, et al: Biofeedback vs verbal feedback as learning tools for pelvic muscle exercises in the early management of urinary incontinence after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2002;89:714-719.
30.
Zhang AY, Strauss GJ, Siminoff LA: Effects of combined pelvic floor muscle exercise and a support group on urinary incontinence and quality of life of postprostatectomy patients. Oncol Nurs Forum 2007;34:47-53.
31.
Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D, Badenoch D, Straus S, Haynes B, et al: Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine levels of evidence, 2009. http://www.cebm.net/?o=1116 (accessed 20 August 2014).
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.