Purpose: To investigate the association between the laterality of diagnostic prostate cancer-positive biopsy cores and definitive tumor stage on final pathology (organ-confined versus non-organ-confined). Patients and Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 165 men after radical prostatectomy fulfilling our active surveillance criteria at the time of surgery. Nominal variables were compared using Fisher's exact test, continuous variables using Mann-Whitney test. Odds ratios including 95% Wald and probabilities including 95% Wilson confidence intervals are provided. Results: 5 (3%) patients had non-organ-confined disease: 2 out of 144 (1%) patients with unilateral and 3 out of 17 (18%) patients with bilateral cancer-positive biopsy cores (p = 0.009). The estimated odds ratio for non-organ-confined disease was 14.67 (95% confidence interval 1.55-189.23) for patients with bilateral compared to patients with unilateral cancer-positive biopsy cores. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of bilaterally positive biopsies as an additional criterion to identify non-organ-confined disease are 60, 91 and 90%, respectively. Conclusion: In our cohort, patients with bilaterally positive biopsy cores were significantly more likely to harbor a non-organ-confined tumor than patients with unilaterally positive cores. Due to their high specificity, bilaterally positive biopsies may represent a reasonable exclusion criterion for active surveillance if our results are corroborated in further studies.

Keywords:
Active surveillance, Patient selection, Laterality of prostate cancer-positive cores, Non-organ-confined disease
1.
Schröder FH, Hugosson J, Roobol MJ, Tammela TL, Ciatto S, Nelen V, Kwiatkowski M, Lujan M, Lilja H, Zappa M, Denis LJ, Recker F, Páez A, Määttänen L, Bangma CH, Aus G, Carlsson S, Villers A, Rebillard X, van der Kwast T, Kujala PM, Blijenberg BG, Stenman UH, Huber A, Taari K, Hakama M, Moss SM, de Koning HJ, Auvinen A; ERSPC Investigators: Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up. New Engl J Med 2012;366:981-990.
2.
Welch HG, Albertsen PC: Prostate cancer diagnosis and treatment after the introduction of prostate-specific antigen screening: 1986-2005. J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:1325-1329.
3.
Lawrentschuk N, Klotz L: Active surveillance for low-risk prostate cancer: an update. Nat Rev Urol 2011;8:312-320.
4.
Tosoian JJ, Trock BJ, Landis P, Feng Z, Epstein JI, Partin AW, Walsh PC, Carter HB: Active surveillance program for prostate cancer: an update of the Johns Hopkins experience. J Clin Oncol 2011;29:2185-2190.
5.
Whitson JM, Porten SP, Hilton JF, Cowan JE, Perez N, Cooperberg MR, Greene KL, Meng MV, Simko JP, Shinohara K, Carroll PR: The relationship between prostate specific antigen change and biopsy progression in patients on active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol 2011;185:1656-1660.
6.
Mohler J, Bahnson RR, Boston B, Busby JE, D'Amico A, Eastham JA, Enke CA, George D, Horwitz EM, Huben RP, Kantoff P, Kawachi M, Kuettel M, Lange PH, Macvicar G, Plimack ER, Pow-Sang JM, Roach M 3rd, Rohren E, Roth BJ, Shrieve DC, Smith MR, Srinivas S, Twardowski P, Walsh PC: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010; 8:162-200.
7.
Raventós CX, Orsola A, de Torres I, Cecchini L, Trilla E, Planas J, Morote J: Preoperative prediction of pathologically insignificant prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy specimens: the role of prostate volume and the number of positive cores. Urol Int 2010;84:153-158.
8.
D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, Schultz D, Blank K, Broderick GA, Tomaszewski JE, Renshaw AA, Kaplan I, Beard CJ, Wein A: Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 1998;280:969-974.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.