Objectives: To report our initial experience with transumbilical multiport laparoscopic nephrectomy (TMLN) with transvaginal specimen extraction. Patients and Methods: Between January and July 2010, 5 married and parous female patients were submitted to TMLN with transvaginal specimen extraction in our center. All data referring to patient demographics, surgery, pathology and perioperative outcomes were recorded. Sexual function was assessed with the Female Sexual Function Index questionnaire before and after surgery. The cosmetic result was investigated by administering the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire and Scoring System (PSAQ). Results: All procedures were completed successfully. The mean operative time was 136 min (range 110-160 min, standard deviation [SD] 20.7). The mean estimated blood loss was 66 ml (range 40-100 ml, SD 24.1). The mean postoperative hospitalization stay was 4.8 days (range 4-6 days, SD 0.8). All patients reported unaltered sexual function after surgery. The better cosmetic results were confirmed by the PSAQ score. Conclusions: TMLN with transvaginal specimen extraction is feasible and safe for married and parous female patients. This technique is a natural evolution towards natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES). By acting as an intermediate-type procedure, it provides a bridge through which NOTES may ultimately gain clinical acceptance.

Keywords:
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery, Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery, Transvaginal surgery, Transumbilical surgery, Nephrectomy
1.
Gettman MT, Box G, Averch T, et al: Consensus statement on natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery and single-incision laparoscopic surgery: heralding a new era in urology? Eur Urol 2008;53:1117-1120.
2.
Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM: Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol 2011;59:26-45.
3.
Raman JD, Bensalah K, Bagrodia A, et al: Laboratory and clinical development of single keyhole umbilical nephrectomy. Urology 2007;70:1039-1042.
4.
Kaouk JH, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al: Single-port laparoscopic surgery in urology: initial experience. Urology 2008;71:3-6.
5.
Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Hellawell G, et al: Technique of laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009;56:644-650.
6.
White WM, Haber GP, Goel RK, et al: Single-port urological surgery: single-center experience with the first 100 cases. Urology 2009;74:801-804.
7.
Canes D, Berger A, Aron M, et al: Laparo-endoscopic single site (LESS) versus standard laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy: matched-pair comparison. Eur Urol 2010;57:95-101.
8.
Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA: Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of convalescence. Eur Urol 2009;55:1198-1206.
9.
Tracy CR, Raman JD, Bagrodia A, et al: Perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing conventional laparoscopic versus laparoendoscopic single-site pyeloplasty. Urology 2009;74:1029-1034.
10.
Tugcu V, Ilbey YO, Mutlu B, et al: Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus standard laparoscopic simple nephrectomy: a prospective randomized study. J Endourol 2010;24:1315-1320.
11.
Christian J, Barrier BF, Schust D, et al: Culdoscopy: a foundation for natural orifice surgery - past, present and future. J Am Coll Surg 2008;207:417-422.
12.
Breda G, Silvestre P, Giunta A, et al: Laparoscopic nephrectomy with vaginal delivery of the intact kidney. Eur Urol 1993;24:116-117.
13.
Gill IS, Cherullo EE, Meraney AM, et al: Vaginal extraction of the intact specimen following laparoscopic radical nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:238-241.
14.
Branco AW, Branco Filho AJ, Kondo W, et al: Hybrid transvaginal nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2008;53:1290-1294.
15.
Sotelo R, de Andrade R, Fernandez G, et al: NOTES hybrid transvaginal radical nephrectomy for tumor: stepwise progression toward a first successful clinical case. Eur Urol 2010;57:138-144.
16.
Kaouk JH, White WM, Goel RK, et al: NOTES transvaginal nephrectomy: first human experience. Urology 2009;74:5-8.
17.
Autorino R, Haber GP, White MA, et al: Pure and hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): current clinical experience in urology. BJU Int 2010;106:919-922.
18.
Alcaraz A, Peri L, Molina A, et al: Feasibility of transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:233-237.
19.
Liatsikos E, Kyriazis I, Kallidonis P, et al: Pure single-port laparoscopic surgery or mix of techniques? World J Urol 2012;30:581-587.
20.
Sotelo R, Giedelman C, Carmona O, et al: Hybrid-NOTES transvaginal hemi-nephrectomy for duplicated renal collecting system in the adult patient. Actas Urol Esp 2011;35:363-367.
21.
Porpiglia F, Fiori C, Morra I, et al: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery-assisted minilaparoscopic nephrectomy: a step towards scarless surgery. Eur Urol 2011;60:862-866.
22.
Fornara P, Doehn C, Miglietti G, et al: Laparoscopic nephrectomy: comparison of dialysis and non-dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 1998;13:1221-1225.
23.
Meston CM: Validation of the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) in women with female orgasmic disorder and in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Marital Ther 2003;29:39-46.
24.
Durani P, McGrouther DA, Ferguson MW: The Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire: a reliable and valid patient-reported outcomes measure for linear scars. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009;123:1481-1489.
25.
Branco AW, Kondo W, Stunitz LC, et al: Transumbilical laparoscopic urological surgery: are special devices strictly necessary? BJU Int 2009;104:1136-1142.
26.
Tunuguntla HS, Gousse AE: Female sexual dysfunction following vaginal surgery: a review. J Urol 2006;175:439-446.
27.
Zou X, Zhang G, Yuan Y, et al: Transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in humans (AUA video presentation). J Urol 2011;184(suppl 4):836.
28.
Zou X, Zhang G, Xiao R, et al: Transvaginal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES)-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: first clinical experience. Surg Endosc 2011;25:3767-3772.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.