Purpose: We evaluated the results of second transurethral resections of the bladder (TURB) after pTa high-grade bladder cancer over a 4.5-year period. Patients and Methods: From July 2007 to December 2011, 2,159 TURBs were performed at our institution, of which 1,143 were initial resections for primary bladder tumor or recurrence. Of these, 142 revealed pTa high-grade bladder cancer, and here we investigated tumor characteristics of initial TURB and results of second resection. Results: The incidence of pTa high-grade tumor was 12.4% (n = 142). Of 87 patients who underwent a second resection, tumor was found in 36 (41.4%); tumors were multifocal in 25 (69.4%) and <3 cm in 29 (80.6%). Tumor was detected at the primary site in 38.9%, at other locations in 22.2%, and at both in 38.9%. Histology revealed pTa low-grade in 13 (14.9% of 87), pTa high-grade in 15 (17.2%), and pT1 in 5 (5.7%) patients. No muscle-invasive tumor was detected. A significant association was found for the number of tumors at initial TURB: in patients with tumor at second resection, 55.1% had had multiple tumors at first resection, more than twice those with solitary tumor (23.7%) (0.004). Conclusions: In our study, Ta high-grade tumors show a relevant rate of persistent tumor at second resection, most of them located at the primary tumor site. As recommended by the American and European clinical guidelines, patients with Ta high-grade tumor should undergo second resection.

1.
Herr HW: The value of a second transurethral resection in evaluating patients with bladder tumors. J Urol 1999;162:74-76.
2.
Brauers A, Buettner R, Jakse G: Second resection and prognosis of primary high-risk superficial bladder cancer: is cystectomy often too early? J Urol 2001;165:808-810.
3.
Babjuk M: Transurethral resection of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Eur Urol Suppl 2009;8:542-548.
4.
Divrik RT, Sahin AF, Yildirim U, Altok M, Zorlu F: Impact of routine second transurethral resection on the long-term outcome of patients with newly diagnosed pT1 urothelial carcinoma with respect to recurrence, progression rate, and disease-specific survival: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Eur Urol 2010;58:185-190.
5.
Grimm MO, Steinhoff C, Simon X, Spiegelhalder P, Ackermann R, Vogeli TA: Effect of routine repeat transurethral resection for superficial bladder cancer: a long-term observational study. J Urol 2003;170:433-437.
6.
Kulkarni GS, Hakenberg OW, Gschwend JE, Thalmann G, Kassouf W, Kamat A, Zlotta A: An updated critical analysis of the treatment strategy for newly diagnosed high-grade T1 (previously T1G3) bladder cancer. Eur Urol 2010;57:60-70.
7.
Dalbagni G, Herr HW, Reuter VE: Impact of a second transurethral resection on the staging of T1 bladder cancer. Urology 2002;60:822-825.
8.
Yucel M, Hatipoglu NK, Atakanli C, Yalcinkaya S, Dedekarginoglu G, Saracoglu U, Aras E: Is repeat transurethral resection effective and necessary in patients with T1 bladder carcinoma? Urol Int 2010;85:276-280.
9.
Herr HW: Tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome. J Urol 2000;163:60-61.
10.
Sylvester RJ, van der Meijden A, Witjes JA, Jakse G, Nonomura N, Cheng C, Torres A, Watson R, Kurth KH: High-grade Ta urothelial carcinoma and carcinoma in situ of the bladder. Urology 2005;66(suppl 1):90-107.
11.
Peretsman S: Editorial comment to Herr: Tumor progression and survival of patients with high grade, noninvasive papillary (TaG3) bladder tumors: 15-year outcome. J Urol 2000;163:61-62.
12.
Huang J, Fu J, Zhan H, Xie K, Liu B, Yang F, Lu Y, Zhou X: Analysis of the absence of the detrusor muscle in initial transurethral resected specimens and the presence of residual tumor tissue. Urol Int 2012;89:319-325.
13.
Klan R, Loy V, Huland H: Residual tumor discovered in routine second transurethral resection in patients with stage T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. J Urol 1991;146:316-318.
14.
Schips L, Augustin H, Zigeuner RE, Galle G, Habermann H, Trummer H, Pummer K, Hubmer G: Is repeated transurethral resection justified in patients with newly diagnosed superficial bladder cancer? Urology 2002;59:220-223.
15.
Zurkirchen MA, Sulser T, Gaspert A, Hauri D: Second transurethral resection of superficial transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a must even for experienced urologists. Urol Int 2004;72:99-102.
16.
Herr HW: Role of re-resection in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. ScientificWorldJournal 2011;11:283-288.
17.
Brausi M, Collette L, Kurth K, van der Meijden AP, Oosterlinck W, Witjes JA, Newling D, Bouffioux C, Sylvester RJ: Variability in the recurrence rate at first follow-up cystoscopy after TUR in stage Ta T1 transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder: a combined analysis of seven EORTC studies. Eur Urol 2002;41:523-531.
18.
Kausch I, Sommerauer M, Montorsi F, Stenzl A, Jacqmin D, Jichlinski P, Jocham D, Ziegler A, Vonthein R: Photodynamic diagnosis in non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and cumulative analysis of prospective studies. Eur Urol 2010;57:595-606.
19.
Zhu YP, Shen YJ, Ye DW, Wang CF, Yao XD, Zhang SL, Dai B, Zhang HL, Shi GH: Narrow-band imaging flexible cystoscopy in the detection of clinically unconfirmed positive urine cytology. Urol Int 2011;88:84-87.
20.
Sylvester RJ, Oosterlinck W, van der Meijden AP: A single immediate postoperative instillation of chemotherapy decreases the risk of recurrence in patients with stage Ta T1 bladder cancer: a meta-analysis of published results of randomized clinical trials. J Urol 2004;171:2186-2190.
21.
Burger M, Oosterlinck W, Konety B, Chang S, Gudjonsson S, Pruthi R, Soloway M, Solsona E, Sved P, Babjuk M, Brausi MA, Cheng C, Comperat E, Dinney C, Otto W, Shah J, Thurof J, Witjes JA: ICUD-EAU International Consultation on Bladder Cancer 2012: non-muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol 2013;63:36-44.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.