Background/Aims/Objectives: To describe the depth of the laser coagulation zone in vivo based on histological examinations and the functional outcome of a 1,318-nm diode laser for enucleation in benign prostatic enlargement (BPE). Methods: A total of 20 patients with BPE were treated by laser Eraser® enucleation of the prostate (ELEP). Prostatic tissue wedges were evaluated to assess the depth of the ELEP coagulation zones. Additionally, patients were assessed preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively. Results: The coagulation zones were 0.36 ± 0.17 mm in epithelial tissue, 0.28 ± 0.15 mm in stromal tissue, and 0.25 ± 0.12 mm in mixed tissue. The coagulation area at the cutting edge completely sealed capillary vessels, reaching a depth of 0.35 ± 0.15 mm. The diameter of the coagulated vessels measured 1.75 ± 0.83 mm. Mean blood loss was 115.54 ± 93.12 ml, catheter time 1.35 ± 0.33 days, and hospital stay 1.89 ± 0.52 days. The International Prostate Symptom Score, maximal flow rate, and quality of life significantly improved 12 months after the procedure. Conclusions: ELEP is safe and effective for BPE treatment and yields good results at a follow-up of 1 year. Because of the limited penetration depth, damage to the urinary sphincter is not expected.

1.
Herrmann TR, Liatsikos EN, Nagele U, Traxer O, Merseburger AS: EAU guidelines on laser technologies. Eur Urol 2012;61:783-795.
2.
Lusuardi L, Myatt A, Sieberer M, Jeschke S, Zimmermann R, Janetschek G: Safety and efficacy of Eraser laser enucleation of the prostate: preliminary report. J Urol 2011;186:1967-1971.
3.
Yang SS, Hsieh CH, Lee YS, Chang SJ: Diode laser (980 nm) enucleation of the prostate: a promising alternative to transurethral resection of the prostate. Lasers Med Sci 2013;28:353-360.
4.
Khoder WY, Sroka R, Siegert S, Stief CG, Becker AJ: Outcome of laser-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without ischaemia for peripheral renal tumours. World J Urol 2012;30:633-638.
5.
Rolle A, Koch R, Alpard SK, Zwischenberger JB: Lobe-sparing resection of multiple pulmonary metastases with a new 1318-nm Nd:YAG laser-first 100 patients. Ann Thorac Surg 2002;74:865-869.
6.
Ekengren J, Hahn RG: Blood loss during transurethral resection of the prostate as measured by the HemoCue photometer. Scand J Urol Nephrol 1993;27:501-507.
7.
Gravas S, Bachmann A, Reich O, Roehrborn CG, Gilling PJ, De La Rosette J: Critical review of lasers in benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). BJU Int 2011;107:1030-1043.
8.
Seitz M, Ruszat R, Bayer T, Tilki D, Bachmann A, Stief C, et al: Ex vivo and in vivo investigations of the novel 1,470 nm diode laser for potential treatment of benign prostatic enlargement. Lasers Med Sci 2009;24:419-424.
9.
Rieken M, Kang HW, Koullick E, Ruth GR, Bachmann A: Laser vaporization of the prostate in vivo: experience with the 150-W 980-nm diode laser in living canines. Lasers Surg Med 2010;42:736-742.
10.
Seitz M, Bayer T, Ruszat R, Tilki D, Bachmann A, Gratzke C, et al: Preliminary evaluation of a novel side-fire diode laser emitting light at 940 nm, for the potential treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: ex-vivo and in-vivo investigations. BJU Int 2009;103:770-775.
11.
Bachmann A, Woo HH, Wyler S: Laser prostatectomy of lower urinary tract symptoms due to benign prostate enlargement: a critical review of evidence. Curr Opin Urol 2012;22:22-33.
12.
Bach T, Netsch C, Haecker A, et al: Thulium:Yag laser enucleation (vapoenucleation) of the prostate: safety and durability during intermediate-term follow-up. World J Urol 2010;28:39-43.
13.
Wendt-Nordahl G, Huckele S, Honeck P, Alken P, Knoll T, Michel MS, Haecker A: Systemic evaluation of recently introduced 2-lm continuous-wave thulium laser for vaporesection of the prostate. J Endourol 2008;22:1041-1045.
14.
Gilling PJ, Cass CB, Malcolm AR, Fraundorfer MR: Combination holmium and Nd:YAG laser ablation of the prostate: initial clinical experience. J Endourol 1995;9:151-153.
15.
Montorsi F, Naspro R, Salonia A, et al: Holmium laser enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate: results from a 2-center prospective randomized trial in patients with obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2008;179:S87-S90.
16.
Gupta N, Sivaramakrishna, Kumar R, et al: Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of >40 g. BJU Int 2006;97:85-89.
17.
Vavassori I, Hurle R, Vismara A, et al: Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate combined with mechanical morcellation: two years of experience with 196 patients. J Endourol 2004;18:109-112.
18.
Tan AH, Gilling PJ: Holmium laser prostatectomy: current techniques. Urology 2002;60:152-156.
19.
Hermann EL, Nagele U, Traxer O, Merseburger AS: Guidelines on Lasers and Technologies. European Association of Urology, 2011.
20.
Rieken M WS, Müller G, et al: Laser vaporization of the prostate: intermediate-term follow-up with the 200 W high-intensity diode (HiDi) laser system. Eur Urol Suppl 2009;8:269, abstr 589.
21.
Chen CH, Chiang PH, Chuang YC, Lee WC, Chen YT, Lee WC: Preliminary results of prostate vaporization in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia by using a 200-W high-intensity diode laser. Urology 2010;75:658-663.
22.
Erol A, Cam K, Tekin A, Memik O, Coban S, Ozer Y: High power diode laser vaporization of the prostate: preliminary results for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2009;182:1078-1082.
23.
Rieken M, Bachmann A, Reich O: Re: High power diode laser vaporization of the prostate: preliminary results for benign prostatic hyperplasia. A Erol, K Cam, A Tekin, O Memik, S Coban, Y Ozer: J Urol 2009;182:1078-1082. J Urol 2010;183:828-829; author reply 9-30.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.