Objective: To determine the feasibility and effectivity of allogenic frozen-thawed bladder mucosa for urethroplasty. Methods: Bladder mucosa was harvested from 6 New Zealand rabbits. Changes in the bladder mucosa as seen by histological and electron microscope examination were compared between the frozen-thawed and fresh groups. Twelve urethral stricture models were established and randomly divided into two groups. In the test group, we performed urethroplasty with allogenic frozen-thawed bladder mucosa, and the same operation was done in the control group, but using fresh bladder mucosa. The result of retrograde urethrography and histological changes of the urethral sample were compared postoperatively. Results: No obvious changes on histological and electron microscope examination were observed in the frozen-thawed bladder mucosa. Inflammation reaction of the surgical site in the test group was milder than that of the controls 2 weeks after surgery. The urethral epithelial cells grew well 2 weeks after surgery, but lots of epithelia were necrotic in the control group. The urethra of all rabbits in the test group had good continuity and the urethral lumen was large in the test group 2 months after surgery. There was a layer of urethral epithelium in the test group 2 months after surgery, whereas scar tissue was found in the control group. Conclusions: The freeze-thaw technique can maintain bladder mucosa structure and biological function. Frozen-thawed allogenic bladder mucosa may be a potential material for urethroplasty.

Keywords:
Cryopreservation, Urethral stricture, Bladder mucosa graft, Urethroplasty
1.
Peterson AC, Webster GD: Management of urethral stricture disease: developing options for surgical intervention. BJU Int 2004;94:971-976.
2.
Kamp S, Knoll T, Osman M, et al: Donor-site morbidity in buccal mucosa urethroplasty: lower lip or inner cheek? BJU Int 2005;96:619-623.
3.
Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, et al: Substitution urethroplasty of complex and long-segment urethral strictures: a rationale for procedure selection. Eur Urol 2007;51:1093-1098.
4.
Marzorati G, Ghinolfi G, Pachera F, et al: Bladder and buccal mucosa graft in urethral stricture reconstruction. Urologia 2008;75:177-179.
5.
Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, et al: Urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft for complex strictures. J Urol 2009;182:1040-1043.
6.
Bhandari M, Sinha RJ, Singh V: Urethral reconstruction in patients suffering from aphallia: a reconstructive challenge. Urol Int 2011;87:475-480.
7.
Atala A: Tissue engineering for the replacement of organ function in the genitourinary system. Am J Transplant 2004;4(suppl 6):58-73.
8.
Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, et al: Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol 2008;53:1263-1269.
9.
Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, et al: Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet 2011;377:1175-1182.
10.
Singh O, Gupta SS, Arvind NK: Anterior urethral strictures: a brief review of the current surgical treatment. Urol Int 2011;86:1-10.
11.
Li C, Xu Y, Song L, et al: Preliminary experimental study of tissue-engineered urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocytes seeded on BAMG. Urol Int 2008;81:290-295.
12.
Li C, Xu YM, Song LJ, et al: Urethral reconstruction using oral keratinocyte seeded bladder acellular matrix grafts. J Urol 2008;180:1538-1542.
13.
Wang P, Wang YR, Shen XX, et al: Influence of rapid cryopreservation on immunogenicity of ovarian tissue in neonatal rats (in Chinese). Chin J Anat 2006;29:167-170.
14.
Lu Y, Li B, Wang X, et al: The effect of programmed cryopreservation on immunogenicity of bladder mucosa in New Zealand rabbits. Cryobiology 2012;64:27-32.
15.
Wessels H, McAninch JW: Current controversies in anterior urethral stricture: free graft versus pedicled skin flap reconstruction. World J Urol 1998;160:175-180.
16.
Whitson JM, McAninch JW, Elliott SP, et al: Long-term efficacy of distal penile circular fasciocutaneous flaps for single stage reconstruction of complex anterior urethral stricture disease. J Urol 2008;179:2259-2264.
17.
Raber M, Naspro R, Scapaticci E, et al: Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa for repair of bulbar urethral stricture: results of a prospective single center study. Eur Urol 2005;48:1013-1017.
18.
Mundy AR: The long-term results of skin inlay urethroplasty. Br J Urol 1995;75:59-61.
19.
Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M, et al: Anterior urethral strictures. BJU Int 2003;92:497-505.
20.
Elliott SP, Metro MJ, McAninch JW, et al: Long-term followup of the ventrally placed buccal mucosa onlay graft in bulbar urethral reconstruction. J Urol 2003;169:1754-1757.
21.
Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Guazzoni G, et al: Bulbar urethroplasty using buccal mucosa grafts placed on the ventral, dorsal or lateral surface of the urethra: are results affected by the surgical technique? J Urol 2005;174:955-957.
22.
Arlen AM, Powell CR, Hoffman HT, et al: Buccal mucosal graft urethroplasty in the treatment of urethral strictures: experience using the two-surgeon technique. ScientificWorldJournal 2010;10:74-79.
23.
Kumar A, Das SK, Trivedi S, et al: Substitution urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: buccal versus lingual mucosal graft. Urol Int 2010;84:78-83.
24.
Simonato A, Gregori A, Ambruosi C, et al: Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral reconstruction. Eur Urol 2008;54:79-85.
25.
Das SK, Kumar A, Sharma GK, et al: Lingual mucosal graft urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures. Urology 2009;73:105-108.
26.
Xu YM, Fu Q, Sa YL, et al: Treatment of urethral strictures using lingual mucosas urethroplasty: experience of 92 cases. Chin Med J (Engl) 2010;123:458-462.
27.
Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, et al: One-stage urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft: an experimental and clinical study. World J Gastroenterol 2003;9:381-384.
28.
Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, et al: 1-stage urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft for the treatment of a long complex urethral stricture. J Urol 2004;171:220-223.
29.
Coulombe MG, Warnock GL, Rajotte RV: Prolongation of islet xenograft survival by cryopreservation. Diabetes 1987;36:1086-1088.
30.
Solanes N, Rigol M, Castellà M, et al: Cryopreservation alters antigenicity of allografts in a porcine model of transplant vasculopathy. Transplant Proc 2004;36:3288-3294.
31.
Wang Y, Wang P, Shen X, et al: Endocrine function and lymphocyte infiltration of newborn rat ovaries after ultrarapid freezing and allotransplantation. Fertil Steril 2007;87:1438-1443.
32.
Alabedalkarim NM, Bozhok GA, Legach EI, et al: Outcome of adrenal tissue fragments allotransplantation: the impact of cryopreservation. Cryobiology 2012;65:188-195.
33.
Altemus AR, Hutchins GM: Development of the human anterior urethra. J Urol 1991;146:1085-1093.
34.
Ammini AC, Sabherwal U, Mukhopadhyay C, et al: Morphogenesis of the human external male genitalia. Pediatr Surg Int 1997;12:401-406.
35.
Kurzrock EA, Jegatheesan P, Cunha GR, et al: Urethral development in the fetal rabbit and induction of hypospadias: a model for human development. J Urol 2000;164:1786-1792.
36.
Wang X, Chen H, Yin H, et al: Fertility after intact ovary transplantation. Nature 2002;415:385.
37.
Fu Q, Deng CL, Song XF, et al: Long-term study of male rabbit urethral mucosa reconstruction using epidermal cell. Asian J Androl 2008;10:719-722.
38.
Sade C, Ugurlu K, Ozcelik D, et al: Reconstruction of the urethral defects with autologous fascial tube graft in a rabbit model. Asian J Androl 2007;9:835-842.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.