Introduction: Different types of grafts have been described in urethral reconstruction (UR), with penile skin graft (PSG) and buccal mucosa graft (BMG) as the most frequently used ones. It still remains unclear whether one graft is superior in terms of success when compared to the other. Material and Methods: A systematic review of the literature was performed searching the MEDLINE database with the following search strategy: ‘urethroplasty’ AND ‘penile skin’/ ‘urethroplasty’ AND ‘buccal mucosa’. 266 and 144 records were retrieved for urethroplasty with PSG and BMG, respectively. These records were reviewed to identify papers where PSG and BMG were used in UR and where individualized data on success were available within the same series. Results: 18 papers were found eligible for further analysis. In total, 428 and 483 patients were respectively treated with PSG or BMG. If available, follow-up duration was 64.1 versus 42.1 months (p < 0.0001) and stricture length 6.2 versus 4.6 cm (p < 0.0001) for PSG and BMG, respectively. Success of UR with PSG was 81.8 versus 85.9% with BMG (p = 0.01). Conclusions: Success of UR using BMG is significantly better compared to PSG. Results might be seriously biased by a longer follow-up duration and stricture length for PSG compared to BMG.

Keywords:
Urethral stricture, Urethra, Urethroplasty, Free graft, Penile skin, Buccal mucosa
1.
Andrich DE, Mundy AR: What is the best technique for urethroplasty? Eur Urol 2008;54:1031–1041.
2.
Oosterlinck W, Lumen N, Van Cauwenberghe G: Surgical treatment of urethral stenoses: technical aspects (in French). Ann Urol (Paris) 2007;41:173–207.
3.
Barbagli G, Lazzeri M: Surgical treatment of anterior urethral stricture diseases: brief overview. Int Braz J Urol 2007;33:461–469.
4.
Dubey D, Vijjan V, Kapoor R, et al: Dorsal onlay buccal mucosa versus penile skin flap urethroplasty for anterior urethral strictures: results from a randomized prospective trial. J Urol 2007;178:2466–2469.
5.
Mangera A, Chapple C: Management of anterior urethral stricture: an evidence-based approach. Curr Opin Urol 2010;20:453–458.
6.
Webster GD, Brown MW, Koefoot RB Jr, Sihelnick S: Suboptimal results in full-thickness skin graft urethroplasty using an extrapenile skin donor site. J Urol 1984;131:1082–1083.
7.
Ozgok Y, Ozgur Tan M, Kilciler M, Tahmaz L, Erduran D: Use of bladder mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction. Int J Urol 2000;7:355–360.
8.
Xu YM, Qiao Y, Sa YL, et al: Urethral reconstruction using colonic mucosa graft for complex strictures. J Urol 2009;182:1040–1043.
9.
Foinquinos RC, Calado AA, Janio R, et al: The tunica vaginalis dorsal graft urethroplasty: initial experience. Int Braz J Urol 2007;33:523–531.
10.
El-Kassaby A, AbouShwareb T, Atala A: Randomized comparative study between buccal mucosal and acellular bladder matrix grafts in complex anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 2008;179:1432–1436.
11.
Raya-Rivera A, Esquiliano DR, Yoo JJ, et al: Tissue-engineered autologous urethras for patients who need reconstruction: an observational study. Lancet 2011;377:1175–1182.
12.
Bhargava S, Patterson JM, Inman RD, MacNeil S, Chapple CR: Tissue-engineered buccal mucosa urethroplasty-clinical outcomes. Eur Urol 2008;53:1263–1269.
13.
Song LJ, Xu YM, Lazzeri M, Barbagli G: Lingual mucosal grafts for anterior urethroplasty: a review. BJU Int 2009;104:1052–1056.
14.
Patterson JM, Chapple CR: Surgical techniques in substitution urethroplasty using buccal mucosa for the treatment of anterior urethral strictures. Eur Urol 2008;53:1162–1171.
15.
Devine PC, Fallon B, Devine CJ Jr: Free full thickness skin graft urethroplasty. J Urol 1976;116:444–446.
16.
De Sy W, Oosterlinck W: One-stage urethroplasty with free skin graft. Eur Urol 1978;4:411–413.
17.
Burger RA, Muller SC, el-Damanhoury H, et al: The buccal mucosal graft for urethral reconstruction: a preliminary report. J Urol 1992;147:662–664.
18.
Bhargava S, Chapple CR: Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: is it the new gold standard? BJU Int 2004;93:1191–1193.
19.
Dubey D, Kumar A, Mandhani A, et al: Buccal mucosal urethroplasty: a versatile technique for all urethral segments. BJU Int 2005;95:625–629.
20.
Pugliese JM, Morey AF, Peterson AC: Lichen sclerosus: review of the literature and current recommendations for management. J Urol 2007;178:2268–2276.
21.
Wessells H, McAninch JW: Use of free grafts in urethral stricture reconstruction. J Urol 1996;155:1912–1915.
22.
Wessells H, Morey AF, McAninch JW: Single stage reconstruction of complex anterior urethral strictures: combined tissue transfer techniques. J Urol 1997;157:1271–1274.
23.
Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Rizzo M: Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa in adult bulbourethral strictures. J Urol 1998;160:1307–1309.
24.
Guralnick ML, Webster GD: The augmented anastomotic urethroplasty: indications and outcome in 29 patients. J Urol 2001;165:1496–1501.
25.
Wessells H: Ventral onlay graft techniques for urethroplasty. Urol Clin North Am 2002;29:381–387, vii.
26.
Raber M, Naspro R, Scapaticci E, et al: Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa for repair of bulbar urethral stricture: results of a prospective single center study. Eur Urol 2005;48:1013–1017.
27.
Berger AP, Deibl M, Bartsch G, et al: A comparison of one-stage procedures for post-traumatic urethral stricture repair. BJU Int 2005;95:1299–1302.
28.
Alsikafi NF, Eisenberg M, McAninch JW: Long-term outcomes of penile skin graft versus buccal mucosa graft for substitution urethroplasty of the anterior urethra. J Urol 2005;173:87, abstr 317.
29.
Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Palminteri E, Lazzeri M: Anastomotic fibrous ring as cause of stricture recurrence after bulbar onlay graft urethroplasty. J Urol 2006;176:614–619.
30.
Lumen N, Browaeys H, Hoebeke P, Oosterlinck W: Ventral onlay graft urethroplasty using genital skin or buccal mucosa in the treatment of bulbar strictures: a retrospective analysis of 41 cases. Curr Urol 2008;2:10–15.
31.
Barbagli G, Morgia G, Lazzeri M: Retrospective outcome analysis of one-stage penile urethroplasty using a flap or graft in a homogeneous series of patients. BJU Int 2008;102:853–860.
32.
Meeks JJ, Gonzalez CM: Urethroplasty in patients with kidney and pancreas transplants. J Urol 2008;180:1417–1420.
33.
Barbagli G, Guazzoni G, Lazzeri M: One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. Eur Urol 2008;53:828–833.
34.
Casey JT, Erickson BA, Navai N, et al: Urethral reconstruction in patients with neurogenic bladder dysfunction. J Urol 2008;180:197–200.
35.
Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Helfand BT, Gonzalez CM: Reconstruction of urethral erosion in men with a neurogenic bladder. BJU Int 2009;103:378–381.
36.
Meeks JJ, Erickson BA, Gonzalez CM: Staged reconstruction of long segment urethral strictures in men with previous pediatric hypospadias repair. J Urol 2009;181:685–689.
37.
Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Oosterlinck W: Urethroplasty for urethral strictures: quality assessment of an in-home algorithm. Int J Urol 2010;17:167–174.
38.
Mathur R, Aggarwal G, Satsangi B: A retrospective analysis of delayed complications of urethroplasty at a tertiary care centre. Updates Surg 2011;63:185–190.
39.
Wood DN, Allen SE, Andrich DE, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR: The morbidity of buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty and the effect of nonclosure of the graft harvest site on postoperative pain. J Urol 2004;172:580–583.
40.
Dublin N, Stewart LH: Oral complications after buccal mucosal graft harvest for urethroplasty. BJU Int 2004;94:867–869.
41.
Barbagli G, Lazzeri M: Can reconstructive urethral surgery proceed without randomised controlled trials? Eur Urol 2008;54:709–711.
42.
Mathur R, Aggarwal G, Satsangi B, Khan F, Odiya S: Comprehensive analysis of etiology on the prognosis of urethral strictures. Int Braz J Urol 2011;37:362–369; discussion 369–370.
43.
Lumen N, Hoebeke P, Deschepper E, et al: Urethroplasty for failed hypospadias repair: a matched cohort analysis. J Pediatr Urol 2011;7:170–173.
44.
Barbagli G, Palminteri E, Balo S, et al: Lichen sclerosus of the male genitalia and urethral stricture diseases. Urol Int 2004;73:1–5.
45.
Venn SN, Mundy AR: Urethroplasty for balanitis xerotica obliterans. Br J Urol 1998;81:735–737.
46.
Depasquale I, Park AJ, Bracka A: The treatment of balanitis xerotica obliterans. BJU Int 2000;86:459–465.
47.
Trivedi S, Kumar A, Goyal NK, Dwivedi US, Singh PB: Urethral reconstruction in balanitis xerotica obliterans. Urol Int 2008;81:285–289.
48.
Andrich DE, Dunglison N, Greenwell TJ, Mundy AR: The long-term results of urethroplasty. J Urol 2003;170:90–92.
49.
Breyer BN, McAninch JW, Whitson JM, et al: Multivariate analysis of risk factors for long-term urethroplasty outcome. J Urol 2010;183:613–617.
50.
Hoebeke P, Oosterlinck W: Principles of wound healing as applied to urethra surgery (in French). Ann Urol (Paris) 1993;27:209–212.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.