Purpose: To introduce and evaluate our open antegrade radical prostatectomy (ARP) technique, a nerve-sparing technique which offers patients better postsurgical urinary continence by our technique of ‘Veil of Aphrodite’. Methods: Ninety consecutive bilateral nerve-sparing ARPs performed using the Veil technique (intrafascial dissection) were compared to control ARP cases using non- or unilateral nerve sparing. Correlation of urinary continence with immunohistochemical (IHC) stains of nerves (S-100) around the prostate capsule was investigated in 20 consecutive patients whose ARPs were performed by a single surgeon. Results: Fifty-one cases (56.7%) had no urinary incontinence and 72 cases (80.0%) had no or only minor urinary leakage (less than 5% in total a day), and these were significantly higher than in the control group (p = 0.000 and 0.003, respectively) without compromising the surgical margins. S-100 IHC stains significantly correlated nerve sparing (bilateral sparing vs. non-sparing, p = 0.0398), urinary continence (no urinary continence vs. more than 5% in total urine volume a day, p = 0.0489), and early removal of catheter (within a week vs. over a week, p = 0.0041). Conclusions: Open nerve-sparing ARP using the Veil technique may offer better urinary continence postoperatively and this may be supported by S-100 IHC results. This method may be adaptable in any surgical institution.

Keywords:
Urinary continence, Open antegrade radical prostatectomy, Veil nerve sparing
1.
Schmeller N, Keller H, Janetschek G: Head-to-head comparison of retropubic, perineal and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Int J Urol 2007;14:402–405.
2.
Masieri L, Lanciotti M, Nesi G, Lanzi F, Tosi N, Minervini A, Lapini A, Carini M, Serni S: Prognostic role of perineural invasion in 239 consecutive patients with pathologically organ-confined prostate cancer. Urol Int 2010;85:396–400.
3.
Walsh PC, Donker PJ: Impotence following radical prostatectomy: insight into etiology and prevention. J Urol 1982;128:492–497.
4.
Su LM, Link RE, Bhayani SB, Sullivan W, Pavlovich CP: Nerve-sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: replicating the open surgical technique. Urology 2004;64:123–127.
5.
Carini M, Masieri L, Minervini A, Lapini A, Serni S: Oncological and functional results of antegrade radical retropubic prostatectomy for the treatment of clinically localised prostate cancer. Eur Urol 2008;53:554–561.
6.
Campbell EW: Total protatectomy with preliminary ligation of the vascular pedicles. J Urol 1959;81:464–467.
7.
Mittemeyer BT, Cox HD: Modified radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology 1978;12:313–320.
8.
Serni S, Masieri L, Minervini A, Lapini A, Nesi G, Carini M: Cancer progression after anterograde radical prostatectomy for pathologic Gleason score 8 to 10 and influence of concomitant variables. Urology 2006;67:373–378.
9.
Stolzenburg JU, Rabenalt R, Do M, Kallidonis P, Liatsikos EN: Endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy: oncological and functional results after 700 procedures. J Urol 2005;174:1271–1275.
10.
Curto F, Benijts J, Pansadoro A, Barmoshe S, Hoepffner JL, Mugnier C, Piechaud T, Gaston R: Nerve sparing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: our technique. Eur Urol 2006;49:344–352.
11.
Hull GW, Rabbani F, Abbas F, Wheeler TM, Kattan MW, Scardino PT: Cancer control with radical prostatectomy alone in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Urol 2002;167:528–534.
12.
Chun FK, Graefen M, Zacharias M, Haese A, Steuber T, Schlomm T, Walz J, Karakiewicz PI, Huland H: Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy-long-term recurrence-free survival rates for localized prostate cancer. World J Urol 2006;24:273–280.
13.
Menon M, Kaul S, Bhandari A, Shrivastava A, Tewari A, Hemal A: Potency following robotic radical prostatectomy: a questionnaire based analysis of outcomes after conventional nerve sparing and prostatic fascia sparing techniques. J Urol 2005;174:2291–2296.
14.
Kaul S, Savera A, Badani K, Fumo M, Bhandari A, Menon M: Functional outcomes and oncological efficacy of Vattikuti Institute prostatectomy with Veil of Aphrodite nerve-sparing: an analysis of 154 consecutive patients. BJU Int 2005;97:467–472.
15.
Savera AT, Kaul S, Badani K, Stark AT, Shah NL, Menon M: Robotic radical prostatectomy with the ‘Veil of Aphrodite’ technique: histologic evidence of enhanced nerve sparing. Eur Urol 2006;49:1065–1073.
16.
Kessler TM, Burkhard FC, Perimenis P, Danuser H, Thalmann GN, Hochreiter WW, Studer UE: Attempted nerve sparing surgery and age have a significant effect on urinary continence and erectile function after radical cystoprostatectomy and ileal orthotopic bladder substitution. J Urol 2004;172:1323–1327.
17.
Sung W, Lee S, Park YK, Chang SG: Neuroanatomical study of periprostatic nerve distributions using human cadaver prostate. J Korean Med Sci 2010;25:608–612.
18.
Kaul S, Bhandari A, Hemal A, Savera A, Shrivastava A, Menon M: Robotic radical prostatectomy with preservation of the prostatic fascia: a feasibility study. Urology 2005;66:1261–1265.
19.
Walsh PC: Anatomic radical retropubic prostatectomy; in Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED Jr, Wein AJ (eds): Campbell’s Urology. Philadelphia, Saunders, 2002, pp 3107–3129.
20.
Stolzenburg JU, McNeill A, Liatsikos EN: Nerve-sparing endoscopic extraperitoneal radical prostatectomy. BJU Int 2008;101:909–928.
21.
Galfano A, Ascione A, Grimaldi S, Petralia G, Strada E, Bocciardi AM: A new anatomic approach for robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy: a feasibility study for completely intrafascial surgery. Eur Urol 2010;58:457–461.
22.
Walz J, Burnett AL, Costello AJ, Eastham JA, Graefen M, Guillonneau B, Menon M, Montorsi F, Myers RP, Rocco B, Villers A: A critical analysis of the current knowledge of surgical anatomy related to optimization of cancer control and preservation of continence and erection in candidates for radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2010;57:179–192.
23.
Mauroy B, Demondion X, Drizenko A, Goullet E, Bonnal JL, Biserte J, Abbou C: The inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic plexus): its importance in neural preservation techniques. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25:6–15.
24.
Baader B, Herrmann M: Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis. Clin Anat 2003;16:119–130.
25.
Lunacek A, Schwentner C, Fritsch H, Bartsch G, Strasser H: Anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy: ‘curtain dissection’ of the neurovascular bundle. BJU Int 2005;95:1226–1231.
26.
Takenaka A, Murakami G, Matsubara A, Han SH, Fujisawa M: Variation in course of cavernous nerve with special reference to details of topographic relationships near prostatic apex: histologic study using male cadavers. Urology 2005;65:136–142.
27.
Takenaka A, Murakami G, Soga H, Han SH, Arai Y, Fujisawa M: Anatomical analysis of the neurovascular bundle supplying penile cavernous tissue to ensure a reliable nerve graft after radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2004;172:1032–1035.
28.
Akita K, Sakamoto H, Sato T: Origins and courses of the nervous branches to the male urethral sphincter. Surg Radiol Anat 2003;25:387–392.
29.
Vernet G: Innervation of the posterior urethra and bladder neck. J Urol Nephrol (Paris) 1974;80:183–189.
30.
Takenaka A, Hara R, Soga H, Murakami G, Fujisawa M: A novel technique for approaching the endopelvic fascia in retropubic radical prostatectomy, based on an anatomical study of fixed and fresh cadavers. BJU Int 2005;95:766–771.
31.
Karam I, Droupy S, Abd-Alsamad I, Uhl JF, Benoît G, Delmas V: The precise location and nature of the nerves to the male human urethra: histological and immunohistochemical studies with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Urol 2005;48:858–864.
32.
Narayan P, Konety B, Aslam K, Aboseif S, Blumenfeld W, Tanagho E: Neuroanatomy of the external urethral sphincter: implications for urinary continence preservation during radical prostate surgery. J Urol 1995;153:337–341.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.