Introduction: This study was undertaken to develop knowledge of ultrasound characteristics of germ cell testicular neoplasms, associate these characteristics with histopathologic tumor types, and lay a foundation for study of ultrasound findings in benign versus malignant testicular lesions. Materials and Methods: The medical records and ultrasound images of 107 patients with testicular tumor were reviewed. Demographic and clinical characteristics and ultrasound findings of patients with seminoma were compared to those of patients with non-seminoma. Results: 55 patients had seminoma (1 bilateral) and 52 non-seminoma. Ultrasound images of seminoma were more often hypoechoic, homogeneous, and lobulated than those of non-seminoma (p < 0.001). Images of non-seminoma were more often heterogeneous and cystic (p < 0.001). There was no difference in tumor size, multiplicity, presence of calcium or lesion margination. Testicular microlithiasis was more common in seminoma (p < 0.02). Conclusion: Careful analysis of ultrasound images can permit an educated assessment of testicular tumor histopathology.

Keywords:
Testicular cancer, Ultrasound, Non-seminomatous germ cell tumor, Seminoma
1.
Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E: Cancer statistics, 2010. Ca Cancer J Clin 2010;60:277–300.
2.
Krege S, Beyer J, Souchon R, Albers P, Albrecht W, Algaba F, Bamberg M, Bodrogi I, Bokemeyer C, Cavallin-Stahl E, Classen J, Clemm C, Cohn-Cedermark G, Culine S, Daugaard G, De Mulder PH, De Santis M, de Wit M, de Wit R, Derigs HG, Dieckmann KP, Dieing A, Droz JP, Fenner M, Fizazi K, Flechon A, Fossa SD, del Muro XG, Gauler T, Geczi L, Gerl A, Germa-Lluch JR, Gillessen S, Hartmann, JT, Heidenreich A, Hoetl W, Horwich A, Huddart R, Jewett M, Joffe J, Jones WG, Kisbenedek L, Klepp O, Kliesch S, Koehrmann KU, Kollmannsberger G, Kuczyk M, Laguna P, Galvis OL, Loy V, Mason MD, Mead GM, Mueller R, Nichols C, Nicolai N, Oliver T, Ondrus D, Oosterhof GO, Ares LP, Pizzocaro G, Pont J, Pottek T, Powles T, Rick O, Rosti G, Salvioni R, Scheiderbauer J, Schmelz HU, Schmidberger H, Schmoll HJ, Schrader M, Sedlmayer F, Shakkebaek NE, Sohalb A, Tjulandin S, Warde P, Weinknecht S, Weissbach L, Wittekind C, Winter E, Wood L, von der Maase H: European consensus conference on diagnosis and treatment of germ cell cancer: a report of the second meeting of the European Germ Cell Cancer Consensus Group (EGCCCG): part I. Eur Urol 2008;53:478–496.
3.
Glantz S: How to analyze rates and proportions; in Glantz S (ed): Primer of Biostatistics, ed 6. New York, McGraw-Hill, 2005, pp 123–178.
4.
Miskin M, Bain J: B-mode ultrasonic examination of the testis. J Clin Ultrasound 1974;2:307–311.
5.
Friedrich M, Claussen CD, Felix R: Immersion ultrasonography of scrotal and testicular pathology. Eur J Radiol 1981;1:60–66.
6.
Comiter CV, Benson CJ, Capelouto CC, Kantoff P, Shulman L, Richie JP, Loughlin KR: Nonpalpable intratesticular masses detected sonographically. J Urol 1995;154:1367–1369.
7.
Heidenreich A, Weissbach L, Holtl W, Albers P, Kliesch S, Kohrmann KU, Dieckmann KP for the German Testicular Cancer Study Group: Organ-sparing surgery for malignant germ cell tumor of the testis. J Urol 2001;166:2161–2165.
8.
Passarella M, Usta MF, Bivalacqua TJ, Hellstrom WJ, Davis R: Testicular-sparing surgery: a reasonable option in selected patients with testicular lesions. BJU Int 2003;91:337–340.
9.
Hopps CV, Goldstein M: Ultrasound-guided needle localization and microsurgical exploration for incidental nonpalpable testicular tumor. J Urol 2002;168:1084–1087.
10.
Marth D, Scheidegger J, Studer UE: Ultrasonography of testicular tumors. Urol Int 1990;45:237–240.
11.
Geraghty MJ, Lee FT Jr, Bernsten SA, Gilchrist K, Pozniak MA, Yandow DJ: Sonography of testicular tumors and tumor-like conditions: a radiologic-pathologic correlation. Crit Rev Diagn Imaging 1998;39:1–63.
12.
Schwerk WB, Schwerk WN, Rodeck G: Testicular tumors: prospective analysis of real-time ultrasound patterns and abdominal staging. Radiology 1987;164:369–374.
13.
Nachtsheim DA, Scheible FW, Gosink B: Ultrasonography of testis tumors. J Urol 1983;129:978–981.
14.
Rosi P, Valli PP, Marzi M, Cesaroni S, Bracarda S, Porena M: Echographic features of testicular neoplasms. Our experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl 1994;66:183–185.
15.
Gallardo Agramayor E, Pena Gomez E, Lopez Rasines G, Ortega Garcia E, Calabia de Diego A, Portillo Martin JA, Martin Garcia B: Testicular tumors. Echographic findings. Arch Esp Urol 1996;49:622–626.
16.
Dogra VS, Gottlieb RH, Oka M, Rubens DJ: Sonography of the scrotum. Radiology 2003;227:18–36.
17.
Gerscovich EO: High-resolution ultrasonography in the diagnosis of scrotal pathology. II. Tumors. Clin Ultrasound 1993;21:375–386.
18.
Carroll BA, Gross DM: High-frequency scrotal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1983;140:511–515.
19.
Grantham JG, Charboneau JW, James EM, Kirschling RJ, Kvols LK, Segura JW, Wold LE: Testicular neoplasms: 29 tumors studied by high-resolution US. Radiology 1985;157:775–780.
20.
Subramanyam BR, Horii SC, Hilton S: Diffuse testicular disease: sonographic features and significance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1985;145:1221–1224.
21.
Leonhartsberger N, Ramoner R, Aigner F, Stoehr B, Pichler R, Zangerl F, Fritzer A, Steiner H: Increased incidence of Leydig cell tumours of the testis in the era of improved imaging techniques. BJU Int 2011;108:1603–1607.
22.
Maizlin ZV, Belenky A, Kunichezky M, Sandbank J, Strauss S: Leydig cell tumors of the testis: gray scale and color Doppler sonographic appearance. J Ultrasound Med 2004;23:959–964.
23.
Cast JE, Nelson WM, Early AS, Bivani S, Cooksey G, Warnock NG, Breen DJ: Testicular microlithiasis: prevalence and tumor risk in a population referred for scrotal sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:1703–1706.
24.
Peterson AC, Bauman JM, Light DE, McMann LP, Costabile RA: The prevalence of testicular microlithiasis in an asymptomatic population of men 18 to 35 years old. J Urol 2001;166:2061–2064.
25.
Ringdahl E, Claybrook K, Teague JL, Northrup M: Testicular microlithiasis and its relation to testicular cancer on ultrasound findings of symptomatic men. J Urol 2004;172:1904–1906.
26.
Bach AM, Hann LE, Hadar O, Shi W, Yoo HH, Giess CS, Sheinfeld J, Thaler H: Testicular microlithiasis: what is its association with testicular cancer? Radiology 2001;220:70–75.
27.
Costabile RA: How worrisome is testicular microlithiasis? Curr Opin Urol 2007;17:419–423.
28.
Meissner A, Mamoulakis C, de la Rosette JJ, Pes MP: Clinical update on testicular microlithiasis. Curr Opin Urol 2009;19:615–618.
29.
Bennettt HF, Middleton WD, Bullock AD, Teefey SA: Testicular microlithiasis: US follow-up. Radiology 2001;218:359–363.
30.
Bach AM, Hann LE, Shi W, Giess CS, Yoo HH, Sheinfeld J, Thaler HT: Is there an increased incidence of contralateral testicular cancer in patients with intratesticular microlithiasis? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180:497–500.
31.
Schoppler G, Heinzelbecker J, Michaely HJ, Dinter D, Clevert DA, Pelzer AE: The impact of ultrasound in urology (in German). Urologe A 2012;51:81–98.
32.
Lassau N, Chami L, Chebil M, Benatsou B, Bidault S, Girard E, Abboud G, Roche A: Dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCE-US) and anti-angiogenic treatments. Discov Med 2011;11:18–24.
33.
Lock G, Schmidt C, Helmich F, Stolle E, Dieckmann KP: Early experience with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of testicular masses: a feasibility study. Urology 2011;77:1049–1053.
34.
Grasso M, Blanco S Raber M, Nespoli L: Elastosonography of the testis: preliminary experience. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2010;82:160–163.
35.
Soh E, Berman LH, Grant JW, Bullock N, Williams MV: Ultrasound-guided core-needle biopsy of the testis for focal indeterminate intratesticular lesions. Eur Radiol 2008;18:2990–2996.
36.
Capelouto CC, Clark PE, Ransil BJ, Loughlin KR: A review of scrotal violation in testicular cancer: is adjuvant local therapy necessary? J Urol 1995;153:981–985.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.