Objective: To investigate the effects of increased pressure due to the accumulated fluid around testis in hydrocele on testis diffusion and whether this effect (if any) is correlated with the amount of fluid and duration of hydrocele. Patients and Method: 49 patients with unilateral hydrocele were evaluated by magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging. Results: In the study group, while the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the testicles with hydrocele differed significantly before and 3 months after the hydrocelectomy (p = 0.001), the ADC values of the testicles without hydrocele were not statistically different (p = 0.101). There was a significant negative correlation between the ADC values of the testicles with hydrocele and the amount of the liquid aspirated during the hydrocelectomy (r = –0.615, p = 0.001). There was no correlation between the ADC values of testis and the duration of hydrocele (r = –287, p = 0.156). This is supported by the findings of the present study of reduced ADC values of testis, meaning reduced diffusion of the testis, with an increasing amount of fluid. Conclusion: The pressure of the fluid was suggested to show a mechanical effect that plays an important role in the dysfunction of the testis. The possible dysfunctions of the testicular tissue suggest that they may have a negative effect on fertility.

Keywords:
Diffusion-weighted imaging, Male infertility, Hydrocele, Apparent diffusion coefficient
1.
Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC: Campbell-Walsh Urology, ed 9. Philadelphia, Saunders Elsevier, 2007, pp 2377–2379.
2.
Tanyel FC, Ocal T, Buyukpamukcu N: Excessive sac pressures: the pathogenesis and innocence of hydroceles in children. BJU Int 2001;87:372–375.
3.
Rados N, Trnski D, Keros P: The biomechanical aspect of testis hydrocele. Acta Med Croatica 1996;50:33–36.
4.
Dandapat MC, Padhi NC, Patra AP: Effect of hydrocele on testis and spermatogenesis. Br J Surg 1990;77:1293–1294.
5.
Mangoud AM, Emara MW, Ghobish A: Hydrocele in filarial and non-filarial patients. Histopathological, histochemical and ultrastructural studies. J Egypt Soc Parasitol 1993;23:43–54.
6.
Sener RN: Diffusion MRI: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain, and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2001;25:299–326.
7.
Al-Okaili RN, Krejza J, Wang S, Woo JH, Melhem ER: Advanced MR imaging techniques in the diagnosis of intraaxial brain tumors in adults. Radiographics 2006;26:173–189.
8.
Srinivasan A, Goyal M, Al Azri F, Lum C: State-of-the-art imaging of acute stroke. Radiographics 2006;26:75–95.
9.
Kangasniemi M, Kaipia A, Joensuu R: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of rat testes: a method for early detection of ischemia. J Urol 2001;166:2542–2544.
10.
Lim HK, Kim JK, Kim KA, Cho KS: Prostate cancer: apparent diffusion coefficient map with T2-weighted images for detection – a multireader study. Radiology 2009;250:145–151.
11.
Nasu K, Kuroki Y, Nawano S: Hepatic metastases: diffusion-weighted sensitivity-encoding versus SPIO-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239:122–130.
12.
Takeuchi M, Sasaki S, Ito M: Urinary bladder cancer: diffusion-weighted MR imaging – accuracy for diagnosing T stage and estimating histologic grade. Radiology 2009;251:112–121.
13.
Zhang J, Tehrani YM, Wang L, Ishill NM, Schwartz LH, Hricak H: Renal masses: characterization with diffusion-weighted MR imaging – a preliminary experience. Radiology 2008;247:458–464.
14.
Maki D, Watanabe Y, Nagayama M, Ishimori T, Okumura A, Amoh Y, Nakashita S, Terai A, Dodo Y: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the detection of testicular torsion: feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34:1137–1142.
15.
Davis DP, Robertson T, Imbesi SG: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke. J Emerg Med 2006;31:269–277.
16.
Li F, Liu KF, Silva MD: Transient and permanent resolution of ischemic lesions on diffusion-weighted imaging after brief periods of focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 2000;31:946–954.
17.
Moseley ME, Cohen Y, Mintorovitch J: Early detection of regional cerebral ischemia in cats: comparison of diffusion- and T2-weighted MRI and spectroscopy. Magn Reson Med 1990;14:330–346.
18.
Mukherji SK, Chenevert TL, Castillo M: Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging. J Neuroophthalmol 2002;22:118–122.
19.
Gonzales RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS: Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology 1999;210:155–162.
20.
Tong DC, Albers GW: Diffusion and perfusion magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of acute stroke: potential use in guiding thrombolytic therapy. Curr Opin Neurol 2000;13:45–50.
21.
Moritani T, Shrier DA, Numaguchi Y: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging: clinical applications and pitfalls: a pictorial essay. Clin Imaging 2000;24:181–192.
22.
Bayne A, Paduch D, Skoog SJ: Pressure, fluid and anatomical characteristics of abdominoscrotal hydroceles in infants. J Urol 2008;180:1720–1723.
23.
Politoff L, Hadziselimovic F, Herzog B: Does hydrocele affect later fertility? Fertil Steril 1990;53:700–703.
24.
Singh MP, Goel TC, Singh M: Alterations in testicular functions in patients of scrotal hydrocele. Indian J Med Res 1989;90:124–126.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.