Objective: The incidence of urethral injuries in children is rare due to the fact that the urethra is short, mobile and protected by the pubic bone. The management of urethral trauma in childhood remains controversial because of the limited expertise of most urologists. Material and Methods: We performed a literature review by searching the Medline database for articles published between 1975 and 2010 based on clinical relevance. Electronic searches were limited to the keywords ‘pediatric’, ‘urethral injury’, ‘trauma’ and ‘reconstruction’. Results: Retrograde urethrography is considered the gold standard for diagnosis of urethral injuries. The initial management should ensure drainage of the bladder either by suprapubic cystostomy or urethral realignment if possible: in complete anterior urethral disruption as well as in children with life-threatening pelvic and intra-abdominal injuries after posterior urethral injuries, a deferred repair after 3 months is necessary. Immediate primary suturing of disrupted and dislocated urethral ends should be avoided because of high complication rates. Primary repair, however, of the defect is possible in girls avoiding a 2-stage approach. Conclusion: The aim of therapy is minimizing remote damages such as urethrocutaneous fistulae, periurethral diverticulae, strictures, incontinence and impotence with different therapeutic management depending on classification of the injury and the presence of life-threatening injuries.

Keywords:
Reconstruction, Urethral injury, Urethral stricture, Trauma, Diagnosis, Therapy
1.
Garrett RA: Pediatric urethral and perineal injuries. Pediatr Clin North Am 1975;22:401–406.
2.
Holland AJ, Cohen RC, McKertich KM, et al: Urethral trauma in children. Pediatr Surg Int 2001;17:58–61.
3.
Koraitim MM: Posttraumatic posterior urethral strictures in children: a 20-year experience. J Urol 1997;157:641–645.
4.
Torode I, Zieg D: Pelvic fractures in children. J Pediatr Orthop 1985;5:76–84.
5.
Bucholz RW: The pathological anatomy of Malgaigne fracture-dislocations of the pelvis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1981;63:400–404.
6.
Devine CJ Jr, Jordan GH, Devine PC: Primary realignment of the disrupted prostatomembranous urethra. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:291–295.
7.
Goldman SM, Sandler CM, Corriere JN, et al: Blunt urethral trauma: a unified, anatomical mechanical classification. J Urol 1997;157:85–89.
8.
Tarman GJ, Kaplan GW, Lerman SL, et al: Lower genitourinary injury and pelvic fractures in pediatric patients. Urology 2002;59:123–126, discussion 126.
9.
Koraitim MM, Marzouk ME, Atta MA, et al: Risk factors and mechanism of urethral injury in pelvic fractures. Br J Urol 1996;77:876–880.
10.
Bond SJ, Gotschall CS, Eichelberger MR: Predictors of abdominal injury in children with pelvic fracture. J Trauma 1991;31:1169–1173.
11.
Lynch JM, Gardner MJ, Albanese CT: Blunt urogenital trauma in prepubescent female patients: more than meets the eye! Pediatr Emerg Care 1995;11:372–375.
12.
Hernandez J, Morey AF: Anterior urethral injury. World J Urol 1999;17:96–100.
13.
Sandler CM, MCCallum RW: Urethral trauma; in Pollack HM, McClennan BL, Dyer R, Kenney PJ (eds): Clinical Urography, ed 2. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, 2000, pp 1819–1837.
14.
Ali M, Safriel Y, Sclafani SJ, et al: CT signs of urethral injury. Radiographics 2003;23:951–963.
15.
Morey AF, McAninch JW: Reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption injuries: outcome analysis in 82 patients. J Urol 1997;157:506–510.
16.
Pavlica P, Barozzi L, Menchi I: Imaging of male urethra. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1583–1596.
17.
Morey AF, McAninch JW: Sonographic staging of anterior urethral strictures. J Urol 2000;163:1070–1075.
18.
McAninch JW: Urethral injuries in female subjects following pelvic fractures. J Urol 1992;147:143.
19.
Hadidi AT, Azmy AF: Hypospadias Surgery: An Illustrated Guide. Berlin, Springer, 2003.
20.
Mundy AR: The role of delayed primary repair in the acute management of pelvic fracture injuries of the urethra. Br J Urol 1991;68:273–276.
21.
Turner-Warwick R: Prevention of complications resulting from pelvic fracture urethral injuries and from their surgical management. Urol Clin North Am 1989;16:335–358.
22.
Freitas Filho LG, Carnevale J, et al: Posterior urethral injuries and the Mitrofanoff principle in children. BJU Int 2003;91:402–405.
23.
Chapple C, Barbagli G, Jordan G, et al: Consensus statement on urethral trauma. BJU Int 2004;93:1195–1202.
24.
Podesta ML, Medel R, Castera R, et al: Immediate management of posterior urethral disruptions due to pelvic fracture: therapeutic alternatives. J Urol 1997;157:1444–1448.
25.
Elliott DS, Barrett DM: Long-term followup and evaluation of primary realignment of posterior urethral disruptions. J Urol 1997;157:814–816.
26.
Radiological protection and safety in medicine. A report of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Ann ICRP 1996;26:1–47.
27.
Koraitim MM: Pelvic fracture urethral injuries: the unresolved controversy. J Urol 1999;161:1433–1441.
28.
Boone TB, Wilson WT, Husmann DA: Postpubertal genitourinary function following posterior urethral disruption in children. J Urol 1992;148:1232–1234.
29.
Jeong-ah Ryu MD, Bohyun Kim MD: MR imaging of the male and female urethra. Radiographics 2001;21:1169–1185.
30.
Webster GD, Sihelnik S: The management of strictures of the membranous urethra. J Urol 1985;134:469–473.
31.
Lenzi R, Selli C, Stomaci N, et al: Bladder herniation after transpubic urethroplasty. J Urol 1983;130:778–780.
32.
Basiri A, Shadpour P, Moradi MR, et al: Symphysiotomy: a viable approach for delayed management of posterior urethral injuries in children. J Urol 2002;168:2166–2169.
33.
Koraitim MM: On the art of anastomotic posterior urethroplasty: a 27-year experience. J Urol 2005;173:135–139.
34.
Dorairajan LN, Gupta H, Kumar S: Pelvic fracture-associated urethral injuries in girls: experience with primary repair. BJU Int 2004;94:134–136.
35.
Merchant WC 3rd, Gibbons MD, Gonzales ET Jr: Trauma to the bladder neck, trigone and vagina in children. J Urol 1984;131:747–750.
36.
Thambi Dorai CR, Boucaut HA, Dewan PA: Urethral injuries in girls with pelvic trauma. Eur Urol 1993;24:371–374.
37.
Podesta ML, Jordan GH: Pelvic fracture urethral injuries in girls. J Urol 2001;165:1660–1665.
38.
Ahmed S, Kardar AH: Construction of a neourethra in girls: follow-up results. Pediatr Surg Int 2000;16:584–585.
39.
Hemal AK, Dorairajan LN, Gupta NP: Posttraumatic complete and partial loss of urethra with pelvic fracture in girls: an appraisal of management. J Urol 2000;163:282–287.
40.
Hosseini J, Tavakkoli Tabassi K, Razi A: Delayed retropubic urethroplasty of completely transected urethra associated with pelvic fracture in girls. Urol J 2009;6:272–275.
41.
Fenton AS, Morey AF, Aviles R, et al: Anterior urethral stricture: etiology and characteristics. Urology 2005;65:1055–1058.
42.
D’Cruz R, Soundappan SS, Cass DT, Smith G: Catheter balloon-related urethral trauma in children. J Paediatr Child Health 2009;45:564–566.
43.
Alcázar García A, Daviu Llorens E, Daza Laguna A, et al: Can bladder catheterization in pediatrics cause complications? The case of a urethral dysuria cystograph (in Spanish). Rev Enferm 2009;32:60–63.
44.
Prabhu S, Cochran W, Raine PA, et al: Postcatheterization urethral strictures following cardiac surgery in children. J Pediatr Surg 1985;20:69–71.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.