Background: No relevant data have been published on the impact of retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (LND) on clinical outcome in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer. Methods: We retrospectively studied the records of 6 patients with lymph node metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent a retroperitoneal LND between 2005 and 2010. Complication rate and clinical outcome were examined. Results: Mean patient age was 69.2 (63–81) years. Primary therapy was radical prostatectomy, radiation therapy, or pelvic LND and androgen deprivation in 3, 2 and 1 cases, respectively. Mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at LND was 37.6 (20.3–139) ng/dl. LND was performed as a modified unilateral (n = 3), bilateral (n = 1) and bilateral extended (n = 2) approach with a median lymph node density of 0.739 (0.111–1). Preoperative Charlson index was 0 (n = 3) or 1 (n = 3). No intra- or postoperative complications occurred. The average postoperative decline of PSA was 39.3% (–99.4 to +31.3). Differences between mean pre- and postoperative PSA velocities and densities were 23.9 ng/ml/year and 11.2 months, respectively (p = 0.24 and p = 0.40). Four patients (67%) developed bone metastases after a mean period of 23.5 (5–58) months. Median bone metastases-free survival was 15.5 months and median overall survival after LND was 31.7 months on Kaplan-Meier analysis. Conclusions: A selective LND in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients could be safely performed. A positive effect on the PSA and PSA kinetics was accomplished for the majority of patients. This new surgical approach represents an alternative treatment option in the palliative setting of prostate cancer patients and could delay toxic systemic therapy up to 12 months.

Keywords:
Lymph node dissection, Biochemical recurrence, PET-CT imaging, Prostate cancer
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel
2012
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.