Objective: To evaluate the value of intraoperative laparoscopic ultrasonography (ILUS) in retrolaparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery. Methods: A total of 81 cases were studied during a 5-year period: 38 patients with a benign renal tumor who underwent enucleation of the tumor and 43 patients with a suspected malignant renal tumor who underwent wedge resection of the tumor. ILUS was used to evaluate renal perfusion, locate the tumor, precisely delineate the tumor border, characterize the tumor, and look for any suspected satellite renal masses. Results: All procedures were successful without conversion to open surgery. The mean operating time was 106 min for enucleation (range 70– 150 min) and 114 min for wedge resection (range 80– 235 min). The mean size of benign tumors was 4.02 cm and that of malignant tumors was 3.13 cm, and all margins were negative. An additional renal artery branch was detected in 11 patients. In 2 cases the operative procedure was changed based on the ILUS findings. No satellite lesion was found in any of the patients with malignant tumors. Conclusions: ILUS provides significant benefit in retrolaparoscopic nephron-sparing surgery. In a number of situations, especially endogenic lesions, it is an essential surgical tool.

1.
Pantuck AJ, Zisman A, Belldegrun AS: The changing natural history of renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 2001;166:1611–1623.
2.
Fergany AF, Hafez KS, Novick AC: Long-term results of nephron sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma: 10-year follow-up. J Urol 2000;163:442–445.
3.
Richardson W, Stefanidis D, Mittal S, Fanelli RD: SAGES guidelines for the use of laparoscopic ultrasound. Surg Endosc 2010;24:745–756.
4.
Schlegel JU, Diggdon P, Cuellar J: The use of ultrasound for localizing renal calculi. J Urol 1961;86:367–369.
5.
Sigel B, Coelho JC, Spigos DG, et al: Real-time ultrasonography during biliary surgery. Radiology 1980;137:531–533.
6.
Risaliti A, Corno V, Donini A, et al: Laparoscopic treatment of symptomatic lymhoceles after kidney transplantation. Surg Endosc 2000;14:293–295.
7.
Jakimowicz JJ, Ruers TJ: Ultrasound-assisted laparoscopic cholecystectomy: preliminary experience. Dig Surg 1991;8:114–117.
8.
Berber E, Siperstein AE: Laparoscopic ultrasound. Surg Clin North Am 2004;84:1061–1084.
9.
Fazio LM, Downey D, Nguan CY, et al: Intraoperative laparoscopic renal ultrasonography: use in advanced laparoscopic renal surgery. Urology 2006;68:723–727.
10.
Elias SH, Jamie AK, Michael DS: Laparoscopic Doppler technology: applications in laparoscopic pyeloplasty and radical and partial nephrectomy. Urology 2008;71:952–956.
11.
Aron M, Gill IS: Minimally invasive nephron-sparing surgery (MINSS) for renal tumours part I: laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2007;51:337–347.
12.
Landman J, Rehman J, Sundaram CP: Renal hypothermia achieved by retrograde intracavity saline perfusion. J Endourol 2002;16:445–449.
13.
Crain DS, Spencer CR, Favata MA: Transureteral saline perfusion to obtain renal hypothermia: potential application in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. JSLS 2004;8:217–222.
14.
Jakimowicz JJ: Intraoperative ultrasonography in open and laparoscopic abdominal surgery: an overview. Surg Endosc 2006;20(suppl 2):S425–S435.
15.
Rau B, Hunerbein M, Schlag PM: Is there additional information from laparoscopic ultrasound in tumor staging? Dig Surg 2002; 19:479–483.
16.
Thompson DM, Arregui ME: Role of laparoscopic ultrasound in cancer management. Semin Surg Oncol 1998;15:166–175.
17.
Barbot DJ, Marks JH, Feld RI, Liu JB, Rosato FE: Improved staging of liver tumors using laparoscopic intraoperative ultrasound. J Surg Oncol 1997;64:63–67.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.