Objective: To compare reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidants in internal spermatic vein tissue of men with varicocele and a control group with inguinal hernia. Also to compare the levels of oxidants and antioxidants in infertile and fertile men with varicocele. Patients and Methods: 48 varicocele patients and 12 non-varicocele inguinal hernia patients participated in this study. The varicocele group was again divided into two groups – fertile men with varicocele and infertile men with varicocele. Internal spermatic vein tissue samples were obtained. The level of the malondialdehyde (MDA), an indicator of oxidative stress, and the activities of antioxidant enzymes (defense systems) against oxidative stress such as superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT) were estimated in these tissue samples. Results: The mean level of MDA in the varicocele group was significantly higher than in the hernia group, whereas the levels of antioxidants (SOD and CAT) were significantly lower in the varicocele group than in the hernia group. When compared with the subgroups of the varicocele group, the MDA levels and SOD and CAT activities were significantly higher in the infertile varicocele group than in the fertile varicocele group. Conclusions: Antioxidant enzyme levels generally decrease due to a high consumption in varicocele patients. On the contrary, in our study both MDA and antioxidant enzymes increased in the internal spermatic venous wall of infertile varicocele patients. This situation may be explained by an adaptation against oxidative stress in varicocele, which could be defined as a chronic process.

Keywords:
Antioxidant, Infertility, Oxidative stress, Reactive oxygen species, Varicocele
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.