Introduction: To evaluate if an inflammatory pattern at primary biopsy is associated with a lower risk for cancer in men submitted to repeated saturation prostate biopsy (SPBx). Methods: From January 2005 to January 2010, 320 patients, after a negative primary extended biopsy (median 18 cores), underwent SPBx by transperineal approach performing 27 cores (median). 210 (65.6%) patients had a normal parenchyma and 110 had an inflammatory pattern (34.4%) at primary biopsy (none of them complained of symptoms suggesting a diagnosis of acute prostatitis at the time of biopsy). Moreover, median prostate-specific antigen and abnormal digital rectal examination was equal to 7.3 ng/ml and 3.6% versus 8.2 ng/ml and 3.8%, respectively. Results: Prostate cancer (PCa) was found in 66 (20.5%) of 320 patients. Of these, 42 (63.6%) and 24 (36.4%; p = 0.007) had a histological diagnosis of chronic prostatitis and normal parenchyma at primary biopsy, respectively. Conclusions: An inflammatory pattern at primary biopsy is not associated with a decrease in PCa incidence at repeated SPBx; therefore, only an accurate clinical evaluation including more parameters (i.e. urinary PCA3) could hopefully select men who need to undergo rebiopsy in the presence of persistent suspicion of cancer.

Keywords:
Prostate cancer, Prostatitis, Saturation prostate biopsy, Repeated biopsy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.