Objectives: We evaluated the impact of sleep position on the effectiveness of shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) in renal calculi. Patients and Methods: Patients (n = 120) with a single radiopaque renal stone who were candidates for SWL were enrolled. For studying patients’ position during sleep, a novel sleep position recorder was designed. Group 1 (n = 60) consisted of patients who slept preferentially on the ipsilateral side of the stone; group 2 (n = 60) comprised patients who slept preferentially on the contralateral side. Treatment effectiveness was defined as the absence of residual stones >3 mm up to 3 months after SWL. Results: The mean (range) percent of sleep on the ipsilateral side of the stone was 61.5% (51–78) and on the contralateral side it was 62.4% (51–81) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p > 0.05). The overall success rate of SWL was 88.3% (77.4–95.2) and 70.0% (56.8–81.2) in groups 1 and 2, respectively (p = 0.01). Stone clearance increased with an increasing percent of total sleep time on the ipsilateral side of the kidney stone (p = 0.045). Conclusions: The percent of stone-free patients was higher in the group of patients who slept ipsilaterally relative to the kidney stone compared with patients who slept on the contralateral side.

Keywords:
Shock wave lithotripsy, Sleep, Body position, Stone clearance
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.