Objectives: Endorectal coil MRI (endoMRI) of the prostate is useful to evaluate tumor localization. There is little evidence on patient characteristics affecting its diagnostic performance. We evaluate the influence of clinical and histological parameters on the accuracy of endoMRI. Methods: Sixty-nine patients with prostate cancer were included. After virtually dividing the prostate into pixels of 1 cm2, results of endoMRI were compared with those from prostatectomy specimens’ whole-mount sections. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to calculate the impact of clinical and histological parameters on the number of appropriately described pixels. Results: In 9, no tumor could be demonstrated by endoMRI. 48.3% of patients were staged correctly, 23.3% were over- and 28.3% understaged. Mean rates of correctly labeled pixels were 0.44 (± 0.04 SEM) for tumor and 0.90 (± 0.01) for benign segments. In univariate analysis, the rate of correctly labeled tumor segments showed significant positive correlations with Gleason score ≧7 and negative correlations with prostate weight and multifocality. The rate of correctly labeled benign segments showed significant negative correlation with tumor weight. All factors were independent variables in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: The reliability of endoMRI depends on clinical parameters. Higher Gleason scores, unifocal tumors and smaller prostate volumes ameliorate endoMRI performance.

Keywords:
Endorectal coil, Local staging, Radical prostatectomy, Prostate cancer, Magnetic resonance imaging
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.