Objective: To define a set of quantifiable quality of care indicators (QIs) to measure the standard of care in our institute given to patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients and Methods: Possible QIs were defined and selected by a multidisciplinary project group from recent literature, guidelines, and/or consensus within the project group. In a retrospective study a baseline for each QI was assessed and compared to a predefined benchmark. Results: Four categories of QIs were selected: (1) care management, (2) accessibility and time management, (3) professional competence, and (4) patient factors. A list of 26 QIs was created. In the retrospective study, it became evident that 22 QIs failed to reach their benchmark, because of (1) an inadequate process of care (n = 5), (2) insufficient care given (n = 14), and (3) data not retrievable in retrospective study design (n = 2). Adjustments were made in the different processes of care in order to improve quality of care. Conclusions: In the face of a complete lack of a QoC registration system for MIBC, we listed 26 quantifiable QIs, to measure QoC in our own institute. Our process of care did not meet 22 of the benchmarks, after which adjustments were made. This QoC registration method is a first step in defining applicable quality of care indicators, for implementation in the clinical practice.

Keywords:
Bladder cancer, Cystectomy, Quality of care
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.