Objectives: To evaluate retrospectively the detection rate of prostate cancer (PCa) located only in the transition zone (TZ) by directed cores at repeated saturation prostate biopsy (SPB). Methods: From July 2001 to December 2009, 380 and 43 patients (median age: 63 years) underwent second and third SPB because they were persistently suspicious for PCa. Indications for biopsy were: prostate-specific antigen (PSA) of >10 ng/ml, and PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/ml or 2.6 and 4 ng/ml with free/total PSA of ≤25 and ≤20%, respectively. A median of 23 cores were taken in the posterior zone, including 3 (median) cores in the TZ. The median PSA was 12.8 and 19.5 ng/ml and the digital rectal examination was positive in 36 (9.5%) and in no cases at second and third SPB, respectively. In patients with persistent and/or increasing PSA or abnormal free/total PSA values after negative second and third SPB, a transurethral prostate resection (TURP) was suggested to avoid the risk of missing a cancer localized in the TZ. Results: PCa was detected in the TZ only in 2/82 cases (2.5%), and in details in 1/79 (1.2%) and 1/3 (33.3%) of the men diagnosed at second and third SPB, respectively. After TURP, a PCa was found in 18/95 men (18.9%; 14 stage T1a and 4 stage T1b) and in 3/15 men (20%; 2 stage T1a and 1 stage T1b) previously having had negative second and third SPB. Conclusions: Sampling from the prostatic TZ by directed needle biopsies at repeated SPB was associated with a very low incidence of PCa (2.5%), especially if compared to TURP (19% detection rate), and could be omitted.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.