Introduction: We examined the tolerability of dosage methods of naftopidil in the treatment of male lower urinary tract symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH/male LUTS). Patients and Methods: A total of 80 patients with BPH/male LUTS who had an International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≧8 and IPSS quality of life (QoL) ≧2 were enrolled and randomly administered naftopidil for 8 weeks at either 75 mg once daily (OD) in the evening (group O; n = 41) or 25 mg thrice daily (TID) in the morning, afternoon and evening (group T; n = 39). Results: IPSS total score, IPSS-QoL and BPH impact index (BII) were significantly improved for both groups at 8 weeks after starting treatment compared to baseline. IPSS total score and daytime and 24-hour voiding frequencies were significantly improved at 8 weeks after starting treatment for group O in comparison to group T. Group O showed a significantly better degree of change in BII in comparison to group T. Conclusions: Naftopidil 75 mg OD in the evening was better tolerated than naftopidil 25 mg TID for the objective parameter and BII.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.