Objectives: Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (EC-MRI) is useful to evaluate prostate cancer localization. Herein, we evaluate sensitivity and specificity of EC-MRI in different regions of the prostate by comparing the acquired images to whole-mount sections of the prostate after radical prostatectomy. Methods: 69 patients with localized prostate cancer were included. After virtually dividing the prostate into 12 sectors, results of EC-MRI were compared to corresponding whole-mount sections by contingency analysis. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated for each of the 12 areas as well as for the dorsal and ventral region. Results: Sensitivity right/left was dorsal apex/mid/base 41/41, 60/67 and 73/79%; ventral 33/52, 43/42 and 47/52%. Specificity right/left was dorsal apex/mid/base 92/89, 82/75 and 88/69%; ventral 100/100, 100/92 and 88/83%. Local sensitivity and specificity regarding dorsal versus ventral was 88/100 and 65/87%. Conclusions: Local sensitivity decreased from basodorsal to apicoventral direction, whereas local specificity increased in the same direction. Therefore, prostate cancers demonstrated by MRI are more prone to be detected in the basodorsal region, whereas less false-positive results are found in the apicoventral region. These variations in topographical specificity and sensitivity need to be considered before radical prostatectomy or MRI-guided biopsy.

Keywords:
Endorectal coil, Local staging, Magnetic resonance imaging, Radical prostatectomy, Endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging, sensitivity and specificity
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.