Purpose: To present our experience of hand-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy (HALRC) and compare it with open radical cystectomy (ORC). Patients and Methods: During the period between May 2004 and November 2007, 31 patients underwent HALRC and 39 patients underwent ORC for bladder cancer. The patient demographics, intraoperative variables and postoperative outcomes were compared retrospectively. Results: There was no statistically significant difference with regard to age, sex, body mass index, and urinary diversion in the 2 groups. In the HALRC group, 20 patients had stage pT2 or less, 7 had pT3 disease, and 4 had stage pT4 disease. In the ORC group, 29 patients had stage pT2 or less, 5 had pT3 disease, and 5 had stage pT4 disease. All margins in both groups were negative. The HALRC group had decreased blood loss (250.9 vs. 812.8 ml, p < 0.001) and a lower rate of transfusion (9.7 vs. 76.9%, p < 0.001), but similar mean operative time (365.7 vs. 362.6 min, p = 0.862). Time to liquid diet was significantly less in the HALRC group versus the ORC group (4.3 vs. 6.3 days, p < 0.001). The median number of lymph nodes were similar between the HALRC and ORC groups (14 vs. 15, p = 0.377). Six patients developed perioperative complications in the HALRC group and 12 patients had complications in the ORC group (19.4 vs. 30.8%, p = 0.278). Late complications occurred in 3 patients (2 parastomal hernias and 1 ureteroenteral stricture) in the HALRC group. Conclusions: Compared with ORC, HALRC patients had decreased blood loss, less transfusion requirements, and quicker intestinal recovery. Long-term follow-up in a larger cohort of patients is needed to assess the long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

Keywords:
Bladder cancer, Laparoscopy, Radical cystectomy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.