Introduction: Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is commonly performed as the surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms due to clinically benign disease. However, prostate cancer is not uncommonly diagnosed after such a procedure. We, therefore, determined in a retrospective study the incidence and factors that might predict the detection of prostate cancer after TURP. Patients and Methods: Between June 2005 and June 2007, a total of 476 men underwent TURP at our department. Of these, 411 men (86%) were thought to have benign disease and were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses using age, serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA), urinary retention status, prostate resection weight, FBC and U&E were performed to determine whether prostate cancer could be predicted. Results: A total of 47 men (11.4%) were diagnosed with prostate cancer [24/47 with pT1a (51%) and 23/47 with pT1b (49%)]. Furthermore, the Gleason scores ranged from 5 to 9. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed that only age (mean: 76 years, range: 54–90 vs. mean: 71 years, range: 49–91 for prostate cancer and non-cancer cases, respectively) and serum PSA (mean: 14.9 ng/ml, range: 0.4–78.0 vs. mean: 7.4 ng/ml, range: 0.2–90.0 for prostate cancer cases and non-cancer cases, respectively) were able to distinguish between cancer and non-cancer cases. In addition, using multivariate logistic regression, age and serum PSA were also the only variables that separated the two groups with a ROC-AUC of 70%. Conclusions: Our retrospective study has demonstrated that a substantial percentage of men are unexpectedly found to have prostate cancer after TURP. In addition, age and serum PSA were independent predictors of those who are likely to have prostate cancer.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.