Introduction: The innervation of the membranous urethra (MU) is still under debate. We analysed the functional effects of electrostimulation of the rhabdosphincter branch of the pelvic nerve (RBP) on the MU in a standardized male rabbit model, paying attention both to the efferent and the possible afferent effects of stimulation. Material and Methods: Six male rabbits (chinchilla bastards) were included in this study. Pudendal nerve branches as well as pelvic nerve branches were exposed bilaterally in all animals. Randomized electrostimulation trials of both the pudendal nerve fibres and the RBP were carried out using a biphasic signal (0.3 mA, 200 μs). The stimulation frequency ranged from 10 to 40 Hz in a randomized pattern. Changes in MU pressure were measured urodynamically. The pressure changes occurring as a result of stimulation were compared in both nerve structures. At the end of the stimulation trial, the RBP and the pudendal nerve were dissected at different positions before repeating the stimulation and the MU pressure recording. Results: The mean MU baseline pressure without stimulation was 24 cm H2O (range 21–27) in all animals. During unilateral pudendal stimulation, the mean pressure response rose by highly significant values (p < 0.005) compared to baseline. The pressure response was frequency dependent. Stimulation of the RBP resulted in a small but significant change of the MU pressure in the lower frequency range (10 and 20 Hz) (p > 0.05). On performing stimulation at higher frequencies, there was no significant difference from baseline. The pressure response of the MU during stimulation of the intact RBP did not differ significantly from the response after dissection of the RBP. However, after dissecting the pudendal nerve, the MU pressure response to RBP stimulation was diminished. Conclusion: Our results confirm the primacy of the pudendal nerve in the innervation of the MU. Stimulation of the RBP, however, may produce an afferent signal which is transmitted to the pudendal nerve, thus resulting in a pressure increase of the MU and contributing towards continence. We showed the importance of the RBP to maintain full urinary continence in rabbits. Our results suggest that substantially higher continence rates can be achieved through a nerve-sparing procedure in radical prostatectomy. Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy incidentally also protects the RBP from injury.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.