Objectives: We investigated the relationship between the surgical margin in partial nephrectomy (PN) and thymidine phosphorylase (TP)-expressing macrophages in peritumoral tissue of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: In 46 patients who underwent radical nephrectomy, we measured TP protein levels in tumor tissue, peritumoral tissue and normal tissue, and conducted immunohistochemical staining for TP and macrophages. In addition, we prospectively conducted PN with a 5-mm margin in 11 patients with pT1a RCC. Results: The TP protein level and TP-positive macrophages were correlated with T classification, histological grade, mode of infiltration and venous invasion. However, for pT1 RCC, TP-positive macrophages in pT1a were significantly lower than in pT1b (p = 0.0140), while there was no significant difference in TP protein levels between pT1a and pT1b. No surgical margin was positive in 11 patients who underwent PN with a 5-mm margin, and no patient had local recurrence or distant metastasis during follow-up. Conclusions: The TP protein level and TP-positive macrophages in the peritumor area are thought to be associated with tumor progression in RCC, while a similar relationship was not found in pT1a RCC. These data suggest that a 5-mm margin might be safe to reduce the risk of local recurrence when PN is performed for treatment of solitary pT1a RCC.

Keywords:
Renal cell carcinoma, Thymidine phosphorylase, Macrophage, Partial nephrectomy, Margin
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.