Objectives: Improvements in quality of life (QoL) and disease-related symptoms are key goals in the treatment of hormone refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Our aim was to evaluate the impact of gefitinib on QoL of patients with HRPC. Methods: Patients with HRPC received gefitinib 250 mg daily in addition to antiandrogen plus luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) analogue for at least 2 months or until disease progression. QoL was evaluated monthly by the European Organisation for Research on the Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Pain was assessed daily by patients and scored by visual analogue scale and analgesic consumption in a diary. Monthly pain intensity was estimated using the McGill-Melzack questionnaire. Results: Analysis of global health status according to EORTC QLQ-C30 showed an improvement of the status in only 6 patients (26%). The greatest benefit in the patients was in the subscale representing prostate-specific concerns (including appetite, pain, physical comfort, and genitourinary function). Improvement of symptoms was correlated with antiandrogen withdrawal. Global health status and QoL decreased during treatment according to tumor progression. Conclusions: Among HRPC patients treated with gefitinib, improvement of symptoms preceded evidence of biochemical response of prostate-specific antigen following antiandrogen withdrawal. These findings suggest no beneficial effect of gefitinib in QoL improvement.

Keywords:
Quality of life, Prostate cancer, Gefitinib
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.