Introduction: We assessed the efficacy of using an α-1A-specific blocker for improving the success rate in shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) for lower ureteral stones. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was conducted from June 2005 to December 2006 and involved 107 patients. All the patients underwent SWL with the PCK Stonelith. The patients were randomly divided into 3 groups: group 1 (34 patients) received tamsulosin, group 2 (35 patients) received terazosin, and group 3 (38 patients) received placebo. All patients were diagnosed by kidney-ureter-bladder X-ray, abdominal ultrasonography and intravenous urography. The number of colic episodes, lower urinary tract symptoms, analgesic dosage and days for spontaneous passage of the stones through the ureter were recorded by diary. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA, the χ2 test, Fisher’s exact test and the non-parametric Wilcoxon 2-sample t test. Results: There were no differences between the groups regarding age, stone size, expulsion time and expulsion rate. The number of colic episodes and the analgesic dosage were significantly lower in group 1 compared with groups 2 and 3. A statistically significant difference was observed in lower urinary tract symptoms: lower urinary tract symptoms were observed in 4 of 34 patients in group 1 (12%), in 8 of 35 in group 2 (23%), and in 13 of 38 in group 3 (34%). Adverse effects were noted in 5 of 32 patients in group 2 (16%), which was significantly different in comparison with group 3. Conclusions: Administration of an α-1A-specific blocker reduced analgesic dosage and colic episodes after SWL of lower ureteral stones. There was no benefit with regard to increasing stone expulsion rate or decreasing expulsion time.

Keywords:
Shock wave lithotripsy, Ureteral stone, Renal colic, α-1 Blocker, Tamsulosin, Terazosin
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.