Background/Objectives: The clinical usefulness and optimal dose of naftopidil were evaluated and discussed in 100 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia without urinary retention. Methods: Naftopidil was administered once in the morning in a dose of 75 mg for 6 weeks; following washout for 1 week, a reduced dose of 50 mg was administered for another 6 weeks. Subjective and objective symptoms were clinically evaluated. Results: Significant improvements were observed in nocturia, IPSS, QOL index, Qmax, Qave, and % postvoid residual urine volume after administration of 75 mg as well as 50 mg. Comparison of the results obtained after administration of 75 and 50 mg revealed improvement only in bladder compliance. Among the items of the IPSS, ‘nocturia’, ‘less than two hours urination’, ‘weak urinary stream’ and ‘sensation of not emptying bladder’ improved, after administration of 75 as well as 50 mg. The bladder compliance aggravated to 13.6, from 22.1 ml/cm H2O after administration of 50 mg. Conclusions: Naftopidil could have superior effects in benign prostatic hyperplasia patients whose complaints are storage and voiding symptoms, especially nocturia of three times or more, as well as in patients with low compliance bladder and detrusor overactivity. The recommended dose seems to be 50 mg.

Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Naftopidil, Optimal dose
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.