Objective: Routine follow-up after cystectomy for bladder cancer detect patients with local recurrence late in the course of disease. We set out to determine the value of transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) as diagnostic tool to diagnose local failure. Patients and Methods: Between 1986 and 2003, radical cystectomy for bladder cancer with orthotopic diversion was performed in 642 male patients. We identified all patients that simultaneously had transabdominal ultrasound, digital rectal examination, TRUS and CT/MRI of the pelvis at the diagnosis of local recurrence. Results: Mean follow-up was 59.4 months. 83/642 patients (13%) had local failure of bladder cancer during follow-up. In 48/642 patients (7.5%) the local recurrence was the first site of recurrence. 35/642 patients (5.5%) developed local failure with concomitant distant disease. 31/83 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median time between cystectomy and diagnosis of local recurrence was 13 months (2–51 months). Routine follow-up detected local recurrence in 1 asymptomatic patient. 25/31, 3/31 and 2/31 patients had pain in the lower extremities/pelvis, hematuria and urinary retention, respectively. Digital rectal examination, transabdominal ultrasound, TRUS, and CT/MRI of the pelvis were suspicious for local recurrence in 9, 7, 26, and 29 patients, respectively. Conclusions: TRUS is a highly sensitive tool in detecting local recurrence following cystectomy. It is easy to perform and inexpensive. We recommend TRUS in short intervals in all patients with high risk for local recurrence in order to detect cancer early.

Keywords:
Bladder cancer, Cystectomy, Local recurrence, Transrectal ultrasound
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.