Introduction: The methylation status of selected new p53 target genes in bladder, kidney and testicular cancer was investigated to find similarities in methylation frequency and individual levels of methylation with regard to the histopathological classification and biological behavior. Material and Methods: The patients’ samples were evaluated using real-time methylation-specific PCR (MSP) investigating the methylation status of APAF-1, CASP-8, DAPK-1 and IGFBP-3. Included were 103 patients with bladder cancer, 85 patients with kidney cancer and 42 patients with testicular cancer in non-advanced and advanced tumor stages. Non-cancerous tissue from 49 patients was used as control. Results: Methylation frequency was highest for APAF-1 (88–100%) and DAPK-1 (17–86%) through all the different tumor types. Highest APAF-1 and DAPK-1 levels of methylation were found in the advanced tumor groups. In normal tissue, methylation frequency and methylation levels were significantly lower. APAF-1 methylation was also frequent in normal testicular tissue but to lower methylation levels as in cancerous tissue. APAF-1 and IGFBP-3 methylation levels were significantly higher in recurrent superficial and muscle-invasive bladder tumors. Methylation levels of APAF-1 also correlated with higher risk for recurrent metastatic disease in non-advanced tumors of the kidney. Conclusions: The methylation profile observed demonstrates a substantial role of the APAF-1 gene in tumorigenesis. The different methylation pattern in testicular cancer might represent a different methylotype of this cancer. The extent of promoter methylation may be a promising target for application as a tumor marker in urogenital cancer disease.

Keywords:
Promoter methylation, Quantitative methylation-specific PCR, Bladder cancer, Kidney cancer, Testicular cancer
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.