Aims: To assess the strategy of using an absence of progression at metastatic sites following initial cytokine therapy outcome as a selection criterion for nephrectomy in patients with synchronous metastatic renal carcinoma and an intermediate prognosis according to the Memorial Sloan Kettering prognostic index classification. Materials and Methods: A combined retrospective analysis of patients with clear-cell subtype from studies of initial cytokine treatment response to assist with selection of patients for nephrectomy. We analyzed survival times, UCLA integrated staging system scores, number of nephrectomies and risk of progression to unresectability of the primary tumor during treatment. Results: There were 33 patients in total. Nephrectomies were not performed in 10 (30%) patients whose cancers had progressed at metastatic sites. Median survival time was 4 months with none of the patients dying of local tumor progression. The median survival time of the 21 patients with nonprogressive cancer and the primary removed was 17 months. Of those, 8 had a survival time ≤1 year (median 8.5 months) and a progression-free survival time of 4 months and 13 had a survival time >1 year (median 25 months). The median progression-free survival time was 7 months (4–57 months). Four of the 5 objective responses at metastatic sites (5/33, 14%) occurred in those surviving >1 year. Conclusions: We propose that progression at metastatic sites during initial immunotherapy may be used to identify patients with a short survival time and who are unlikely to benefit from nephrectomy.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.