Background/Aim: To compare serum chromogranin A (CgA) and insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) with the classical prostate-specific antigen (PSA) marker in clinically localized prostate adenocarcinomas. Materials and Methods: This is a prospective single-center study that included 64 consecutive men with newly diagnosed clinically localized prostate adenocarcinoma and 20 consecutive men with histologically confirmed benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A blood sample for the determination of serum total PSA, CgA and IGF-1 levels (RIA) was obtained from all cases. Analysis of variance was performed to evaluate their variations according to disease and the pathological characteristics of prostate adenocarcinoma. Results: Only serum PSA levels (p < 0.0001) and not IGF-1 (p = 0.5475) or CgA (p = 0.5043) were significantly higher in the prostate cancer (PCa) group as compared to the BPH group. A significant variance between BPH and PCa divided on the basis of pT stage was found for PSA levels (p < 0.0001) but not for CgA (p = 0.0869) and IGF-1 (p = 0.6883) levels. Dividing PCa on the basis of Gleason score, a significant variance was found for CgA (p = 0.0100) and for PSA (p < 0.001), but not for IGF-1 (p = 0.6895) levels. Conclusions: In our population the quantification of PSA and CgA serum levels and not of IGF-1 provides independent significant information in the diagnosis and aggressiveness of PCa, respectively.

Keywords:
Prostate neoplasm, Serum marker, Prostate-specific antigen, Chromogranin A, Insulin-like growth factor
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.