Objective: To analyze the correlation between the genotypic and phenotypic patterns of p53 in patients with transitional cell carcinoma (TCC) of the urinary bladder. Materials and Methods: Cross-sectional study of 73 patients diagnosed with TCC. DNA was obtained from the tumor tissue to perform polymerase chain reaction-single strand conformational polymorphism (PCR-SSCP) of exons 5–9 of the p53 gene, with automatic sequencing done on any mutated samples. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was also performed using anti-human P53 monoclonal antibody, and the diagnostic performance of this test was analyzed by a ROC curve, using the presence of p53 mutations found by PCR-SSCP as ‘gold standard’. Results: The cutoff point for defining immunopositivity was 20%. IHC had a specificity of 62.9%, and a sensitivity of 65.8%. The highest sensitivity values appeared in G3 tumors (75%) and infiltrating tumors (71.4%), and the highest specificity values were observed in G1 (77.7%) and G2 tumors (90%) and superficial tumors (66.6%). Mutations in exon 8 gave a positive result most frequently (73.7%) and were considered most relevant in terms of altering P53 function (60.9%). False negatives were documented in 28.5% of infiltrating tumors, and false positives in 33.4% of superficial tumors. Conclusions: There is a moderate correlation between p53 mutations and P53 protein overexpression, with this stronger in high-grade, infiltrating tumors, in exon 8 mutations, and when the mutation induces relevant changes in the protein structure. Although IHC is useful in routine clinical practice, the classic prognostic factors should still be considered the most important in the follow-up of these patients.

Keywords:
P53, Bladder cancer, Immunohistochemistry, Single strand conformational polymorphism, Mutations, Prognostic value of p53 gene alterations
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.