Introduction: To determine the perioperative complications and morbidity of radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and to analyze risk factors for observed complications. Materials and Methods: Data of 1,000 patients undergoing RRP and pelvic lymphadenectomy (pLA) performed by different surgeons of the same hospital were collected. Uni- and multivariate analysis was performed to detect associations between intra- and postoperative complications and specific variables. Results: Relevant intraoperative complications were observed in 28 cases and relevant postoperative complications in 187 cases requiring reoperations in 46 patients. Diverse minor postoperative complications occurred in 75 cases. The surgeon’s experience and the operating time significantly influenced the incidence of intraoperative complications. Extended pLA was associated with significantly higher rates of lymphoceles and reoperations. The patients with lymphocele showed significantly higher rates of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE) and reoperation and patients with DVT a higher incidence of PE and a higher rate of reoperations. The incidence of anastomotic strictures correlated significantly with postoperative urine retention. Conclusions: RRP is a safe surgical procedure. In the hands of experienced urologic surgeons it is associated with lower incidences of severe intraoperative complications. A substantial proportion of postoperative complications are associated with pLA and its extension.

Keywords:
Radical retropubic prostatectomy, Radical retropubic prostatectomy, morbidity, Prostatectomy, complications, Prostatectomy, surgeon’s experience, Pelvic lymphadenectomy
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.