Aims: The urodynamic findings and voiding habits in patients with concomitant clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and detrusor overactivity (DO) presenting with or without the symptom of urgency were compared. Materials and Methods: 84 BPH patients with an urodynamic diagnosis of DO by conventional cystometry were included in the study. The patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of the symptom of urgency. The urodynamic findings, urinary diary and clinical information were analyzed. Results: Among the 84 BPH-DO patients, 52 reported the symptom of urgency while 32 did not. There were no significant differences in mean age, International Prostate Symptom Score and flow rate between the two groups. Patients without urgency had a higher incidence of terminal DO and abnormal bladder sensation. The occurrence of unfelt phasic DO was also significantly higher in this group. Sphincter electromyography showed conscious and subconscious sphincter contractions associated with DO. The urinary diary showed lower 24-hour urinary output, smaller bladder functional capacity and average voided volume in the BPH-DO patients without urgency. Conclusions: BPH patients with DO may neglect the symptom of urgency due to abnormal bladder sensation, or negate the symptom by subconscious sphincter contraction to abort the overactivity. Some may avoid the symptom by drinking less fluid and emptying the bladder at a smaller volume.

Keywords:
Detrusor overactivity, Urgency, Overactive bladder, Urodynamics, Benign prostatic hyperplasia
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2007
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.