Objective: We evaluated whether there is a survival difference between patients having pT2a and pT2b invasive bladder carcinomas without nodal involvement and distant metastases. Patients and Methods: Three hundred and thirty-six patients with invasive carcinomas of the bladder underwent radical cystectomy. Seventy-five patients with organ-confined disease were evaluated. The pathological stage was used as predictor of survival. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to evaluate survival rates. Cox proportional-hazard models were used to identify whether pathological stage, grade, diversion type, age, and gender affect the outcome. Results: Thirty-five patients were in the pT2aN0 group with a mean age of 57.8 ± 1.4 (range 37–76) years, and 40 patients were in the pT2bN0 group with a mean age of 59.5 ± 1.1 (range 37–76) years. There were 2 female patients. The mean follow-up period was 27.41 ± 20.5 (range 3–80) months. The disease-specific 5-year survival rate of the pT2N0 cases was 80.3%. The disease-specific 5-year survival rates for the pT2aN0 and pT2bN0 patients were 84.3 and 66.0%, respectively. The disease-specific mean survival times of pT2aN0 and pT2bN0 cases were 76.2 ± 4.7 and 56.3 ± 7.7 months, respectively. There was no statistically significant survival difference between pT2aN0 and pT2bN0 patients by log-rank test (p = 0.1767). According to the Cox multivariate regression analysis, stage, grade, diversion type, age, and gender were not predictive of the survival in patients with organ-confined bladder cancer (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The level of muscle invasion in organ-confined bladder cancer does not have an influence on the patient survival. Also stage, grade, diversion type, age, and gender are not predictive of survival in patients with organ-confined muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.