Aim: We aimed to evaluate the predictive factors that would in turn indicate stone migration and the effects of these factors on the ultimate success of the intervention. Method: Patients were divided into two groups with respect to the migration of the stone treated. Group I: patients demonstrating stone migration during manipulation; group II: no migration of the stones noted. In the second phase of the study, the results of ureteroscopic management in 433 patients were evaluated with respect to the success rates obtained. Parameters such as stone size, stone burden, experience of the surgeon, length of the ureter proximal to the stone treated, and lastly transverse diameter of the ureter were noted in all patients as possible risk factors for stone migration. Results: Statistical analysis of ureteroscopic success in all patients revealed that there was a meaningful correlation with respect to the length of the proximal ureteral portion (p < 0.0001) and surgeon’s experience (p = 0.004). p value for the correlation between stone burden and operative success was 0.056. There was no significant correlation between stone size (p = 0.51), ureter diameter (p = 0.78), and operative success. Conclusion: Stones that are close to the renal pelvis and treated by inexperienced physicians are the ones most likely to migrate to the renal pelvis during manipulation with pneumatic lithotripsy.

Keywords:
Ureteroscopy, Pneumatic lithotripsy, Operative failure
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.