Introduction: The aim of this study was to compare age, prostatic volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), maximal flow rate, serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), serum free PSA, free/total PSA ratio and PSA density values of familial and sporadic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients suffering moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms. Materials and Methods: Between September 1999 and August 2004, 511 patients with moderate or severe lower urinary tract symptoms (IPSS ≧8) due to BPH were included in the study. Patients with at least 2 first-degree relatives who had undergone surgery or received medication for BPH were classified as having the familial form of the disease, while the remaining patients were taken as sporadic cases. Mean age, prostatic volume, symptom score, maximal flow rate, PSA, free PSA, free/total PSA ratio and PSA density values of the familial and sporadic groups were compared using student’s t test. Results: Thirty-eight patients had a positive family history and formed the familial group, while the remaining 473 made up the sporadic group. No significant difference was observed in the parameters studied, except that mean prostate volume of the familial group was found to be greater and the mean age to be lower than those of sporadic patients in accordance with the literature. Conclusions: Patients with familial BPH need treatment significantly earlier and have larger prostates than those with sporadic BPH.

Keywords:
Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Prostate-specific antigen
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.