Objectives: Since little investigation has been undertaken to determine if α1-blockers should be given continuously to sustain their efficacy, we conducted a pilot study to determine symptom change following discontinuation of tamsulosin after an initial improvement in symptoms in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Patients and Methods: Thirty-three of 78 patients with mild-to-moderate prostate hyperplasia, who had symptom improvement according to the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) to <10 or the quality of life (QOL) index to ≤3 after initial treatment with tamsulosin, were enrolled in this study. Subjective parameters (IPSS and QOL index) and objective parameters (maximum and mean urinary flow rates) were evaluated at baseline and after initial treatment, and 4, 8, 12 and 24 weeks after discontinuing tamsulosin. Results: The rates of successful discontinuation of tamsulosin were high throughout the follow-up period, i.e., 80.6% at 4 weeks, 80.6% at 8 weeks, 80.0% at 12 weeks, and 68.9% at 24 weeks. Temporary worsening in both subjective and objective parameters was observed only at 4 weeks; however, these parameters recovered to almost post-treatment levels at 24 weeks. Conclusion: The present study suggests that continuous treatment is not always needed to maintain urinary symptom relief in a specific subset of patients who felt symptom improvement after initial treatment with tamsulosin.

Keywords:
Tamsulosin, discontinuation, Lower urinary tract symptoms, International Prostate Symptom Score, Quality of life index
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.