Introduction: The type of skin incision affects the course of surgery during radical nephrectomy. We investigated the efficacy of a new type of incision for the surgical approach to large renal masses. Patients and Methods: Fourty patients (23 males and 17 females, mean age 63 years) who underwent radical nephrectomy in our department between 2002 and 2004 were evaluated. The outcomes in the groups with chevron incision and abdominal wall flap incision (AFI) were compared in terms of greatest tumor diameter, operation duration, perioperative blood loss, postoperative complications, and duration of hospitalization. Statistical analysis was made by independent-samples t test. Results: Chevron incision was used in the first 15 patients, while subsequent 25 patients were operated via AFI. The operation duration was slightly longer in the AFI group (3.78 vs. 3 h); however, the mean largest tumor diameter was significantly greater in patients operated via AFI (11.3 vs. 7.4 cm, p < 0.05). The mean blood losses were 1,100 and 590 ml in the chevron incision and AFI groups, respectively (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in terms of duration of hospitalization and postoperative morbidity. Conclusion: In our experience, AFI provides the best exposure and improved control of renal vessels and vena cava during radical nephrectomy and enables a safe dissection even in very large tumors with minimal blood loss.

Keywords:
Abdominal wall flap incision, Large renal masses, surgery, Skin incision type
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2006 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.