Introduction: It was the aim of this study to assess whether the changes in the diagnostic techniques and treatment modalities have altered the epidemiology of male factor infertility in the last decade. Material and Methods: From September 1999 to July 2003, 822 patients were evaluated for infertility in a University Hospital. We divided our infertility patients according to the clinical diagnosis. Results: Most of the patients presented with varicocele (n = 282, 34.3%), idiopathic infertility (n = 260, 31.6%), or had had seminal tract obstruction (n = 85, 10.34%). Least common but equally important causes found were mumps (n = 43, 5.23%), pyospermia (n = 37, 4.5%), systemic diseases (n = 36, 4.37%), testicular failure (n = 34, 4.13%), cryptorchidism (n = 14, 1.7%), ejaculatory dysfunction (n = 11, 1.3%), genetics (n = 9, 1.1%), endocrinopathies (n = 4, 0.5%), testicular cancer (n = 4, 0.5%), and testicular torsion (n = 3, 0.36%). Conclusions: Even with the changes in reproductive healthcare in the last years, varicocele and seminal tract obstruction remain the leading causes of male infertility. However, clinicians should not forget other treatable causes of male infertility such as pyospermia, systemic diseases, or testicular cancer.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.