Introduction: It is recommended that the bladder be filled at least twice to perform a standard urodynamic study. However, the procedure is time-consuming and distressing for both the patient and the professional. The impact of the number of fillings on urodynamic parameters in children with normal urodynamic results and those with detrusor instability is presented in this study. Patients and Methods: Urodynamic data from 70 children with detrusor instability and 42 with normal urodynamic parameters who had undergone 3 consecutive fillings in a single session during a 2-year period were reviewed retrospectively. The variable parameters that were compared between the 2 groups were the mean bladder capacity ratio, maximum filling pressure and the number of contractions during the filling phase. Results: In the normal group, no difference was found in bladder capacities between the 3 fillings, but there was a significant decrease in the maximum bladder filling pressures in the subsequent fillings. In children with detrusor instability, the number of contractions in the 1st filling was significantly higher than those in the subsequent fillings. Also in this group, a significant difference in the mean bladder capacities between fillings was noted as well as a decrease in the maximum bladder filling pressures in contrast to normal bladders. Conclusion: In patients with suspected detrusor instability the bladder should be filled at least twice for a reliable urodynamic assessment. Two normal fillings without contractions, with normal capacity and normal maximum bladder filling pressure are highly suggestive of a normal 3rd filling.

Keywords:
Bladder, Urodynamics, Cystometry
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel
2005
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.